The Artist's Case for Droit Moral and Droit de Suite Continues
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 4220506 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Roberta I Shaffer (corresponding author) |
| Year | 1987 |
| Volume | 15 |
| Issue | 1-2 |
| Pages | 1-9 |
| Publication date | 1987-04-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | International Journal of Legal Information (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0731-1265 • E-ISSN: 2331-4117 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0731126500020412 |
| OpenAlex | W2920969474 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 3 |
In September 1986, Senator Edward Kennedy of Massachusetts sponsored a bill, "The Visual Artists Rights Amendment of 1986" which was not unlike many others that had been introduced into the United States Congress in recent years. ft proposed toexpand the Copyright Act of 1976 by granting artists certain control over their works beyond that currently secured under Copyright, contract or tort protections, as well as the ability to share in the proceeds of future (secondary) sales of the work. Although the bill never saw the light of legislative action, the issues it addressed are very much in the forefront of current art and law concerns
Copyright law · First amendment · Intellectual property · Law and economics · Legislative history · Legislature · Liability · Moral rights · Political science · Sociology · Tort · Art History and Market Analysis · Copyright and Intellectual Property · Engineering · Law · Law in Society and Culture
| Highly cited | No |
|---|