Producing legitimacy at the World Trade Organization

The Role of Expertise and Legal Capacity

Bibliographic Data

ID4237632
AuthorsJoseph A Conti (corresponding author)
Year2010
Volume8
Issue1
Pages131-155
Publication date2010-01-01
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueSocio-Economic Review (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1475-1461 • E-ISSN: 1475-147X
PublisherOxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1093/ser/mwp023
OpenAlexW2156040253
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited14

This qualitative study of disputing at the World Trade Organization (WTO) examines how expertise is acquired and maintained over time and how it influences perceptions of legitimacy held by WTO practitioners. The research demonstrates that expertise is derived from individuals' direct experience with disputing. Trade delegations employ or acquire expertise through the development of in-house experts, contracting private legal representation and seeking legal assistance. Institutionalizing expertise acquired by individuals is a primary challenge for building legal capacity and is linked to serial participation, building informal professional relationships and creating economies of scale in expert practitioners. Nonetheless, challenges remain, particularly related to the cost and difficulty of maintaining expertise over time and the role of market power in retaliation. How countries are able to gain expertise underwrites the legitimacy perceptions of practitioners, which emphasizes opportunities to acquire expertise over the persistence of inequalities in legal capacity.

Business · Economics · International trade · Law and economics · Legitimacy · Political science · Politics · World trade · Global trade, sustainability, and social impact · International Arbitration and Investment Law · Law · World Trade Organization Law

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub