Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Optimal Linearization

Word-Order Typology with Violable Constraints

Bibliographic Data

ID4238133
AuthorsLeland Paul Kusmer (Linguistics Department University of Massachusetts Amherst N408 Integrative Learning Center 650 North Pleasant Street Amherst, MA 01003 USA, corresponding author)
Year2020
Volume23
Issue4
Pages313-346
Publication date2020-12-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueSyntax (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1368-0005 • E-ISSN: 1467-9612
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/synt.12197
OpenAlexW3036797801
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited30

Insofar as linearization is a postsyntactic phenomenon pertaining to phonological forms, it is desirable that it be modeled in a violable-constraint framework, like other PF-branch phenomena. This paper presents such a model, with the goal of capturing the Final-over-Final Condition, a typological generalization that says that head-final phrases embed only other head-final phrases, while head-initial phrases may embed phrases of either headedness. The specific model proposed here, termed Optimal Linearization, is couched in Optimality Theory and comprises three interacting violable constraints on the mapping of syntactic structure to linear order. One constraint, Antisymmetry, closely mimics the action of Kayne's familiar Linear-Correspondence Axiom. An opposing constraint HeadFinalitypenalizes deviations from an idealized head-final order. Lastly, a domain-specific constraint HeadFinality-α enforces head-final ordering only within one constituent, allowing for disharmonic orders that respect the Final-over-Final Condition. Optimal Linearization has several advantages beyond typology, including offering insight into the left positioning of specifiers, which can be seen as the emergence of an unmarked preference for head finality. Linearizing at PF also allows us to model cases where phonological or prosodic properties of words affect their order; this is illustrated with the case of Irish pronoun postposing

Axiom · Constraint (computer-aided design · Domain (mathematical analysis · Generalization · Head (geology · Linearization · Mathematical analysis · Nonlinear system · Word order · Computer Science · Linguistic Variation and Morphology · Mathematics · Phonetics and Phonology Research · Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation · Artificial Intelligence

  • Learning and the typology of word order

    Open Access•Shay Hucklebridge•Glossa a journal of general…•2023

  • A Thematic Guide to Optimality Theory

    Open Access•John J Mccarthy•Thematic Guide to Optimality Theory•2001

  • Adverbs and Functional Heads

    Guglielmo Cinque•Adverbs and functional heads•1999

  • The Syntax‐Phonology Interface

    Open Access•Elisabeth Selkirk•The Handbook of Phonological Theory•2011

  • On the Nature of the Syntax-Phonology Interface

    Zeljko Boskovic•On the Nature of the Syntax-phonolo…•2001

  • Subjacency and S-structure movement of wh-in-situ

    Open Access•Akira Watanabe•Journal of East Asian Linguistics•1992

  • Low sentence-final particles in Mandarin Chinese and the Final-over-Final Constraint

    Open Access•Michael Yoshitaka Erlewine•Journal of East Asian Linguistics•2017

  • Cyclic Linearization of Syntactic Structure

    Danny Fox, David Pesetsky•Theoretical Linguistics•2005

  • Recursion in prosodic phrasing

    Open Access•Emily Elfner•Natural Language and Linguistic…•2015

  • Government and Binding Theory and the Minimalist Program

    Open Access•Lindsay J Whaley, Gert Webelhuth•Language•1997

  • Ranking the Linear Correspondence Axiom

    Luis López•Linguistic Inquiry•2009

  • Phonological conditions on variable adjective and noun word order in Tagalog

    Open Access•Stephanie S Shih, Kie Zuraw•Language•2017

  • Why particles are not particular

    Open Access•Willow Paul, Waltraud Paul•Studia Linguistica•2014

  • Linear Asymmetries and the LCA

    Open Access•Klaus Abels, Ad Neeleman•Syntax•2012

  • Movement Operations after Syntax

    David Embick, Rolf Noyer•Linguistic Inquiry•2001

  • Resumptive Pronouns and Competition

    Ivy Sichel•Linguistic Inquiry•2014

  • A Syntactic Universal and Its Consequences

    Theresa Biberauer, Anders Holmberg et al.•Linguistic Inquiry•2014

  • A Maximum Entropy Model of Phonotactics and Phonotactic Learning

    Bruce Hayes, Camille Wilson et al.•Linguistic Inquiry•2008

  • The Typology of Wh-Movement, Wh-Questions in Malay

    Open Access•Peter Cole, Gabriella Hermon•Syntax•1998

  • Lightest to the Right

    R Bennett, Emily Elfner et al.•Linguistic Inquiry•2016

  • Prosodic Noun Incorporation

    Open Access•Lauren Clemens, Lauren Eby Clemens•Syntax•2019

Unique citing works1
Citations per year0,33
Citation span2023 - 2023 (1)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 1

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae