Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

When working together goes against common sense

A Framework to Bridge Conservation and Agricultural Perspectives in Participatory Working Lands Research

Bibliographic Data

ID4238638
AuthorsHailey Wilmer (0000-0003-0810-9687), Ryan Wilbur, John Scasta, John Derek Scasta (0000-0002-9925-7492), Molly Levy, Vicken Hillis (0000-0002-1022-4628), Gregory Newman, Greg Newman (0000-0003-0503-5782), David Pellatz, David W Pellatz (0000-0003-4751-1150), Lauren M Porensky (0000-0001-6883-2442), Lauren Porensky
Year2025
Volume30
Issue2
Publication date2025-01-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueConservation Ecology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1195-5449 • E-ISSN: 1708-3087
PublisherResilience Alliance (PUBLISHER • CA)
DOI10.5751/es-16092-300221
OpenAlexW4410427023
LanguageEN
Citations received1

As biodiversity conservation becomes more urgent and the links between wildlife and rural well-being become more apparent, conservation researchers increasingly seek to engage with partners in agricultural communities through participatory approaches. A central hypothesis in participatory research is that inclusive, co-produced research facilitates more relevant, usable, and credible knowledge that can inform real-world decision-making processes, such as those that shape the management of rangelands. But how can conservation scientists more effectively collaborate with agricultural communities when dealing with divisive topics where collaboration appears to go against the common sense of distinct social groups? This paper aims to draw lessons for effective participatory working lands research (PWR) from a participatory prairie dog research project in the USA. We explore the Prairie Dog/Cattle Weight Gains (PDCWG) project in the Thunder Basin Ecoregion of east-central Wyoming, USA, to (1) synthesize the participatory methods scholarship into a conceptual framework for understanding the PWR context; (2) apply this framework to the specific experiences of the PDCWG project; and (3) develop an associated list of activities researchers can use to put these insights into practice in other PWR contexts. Our analysis reveals how social-ecological context shapes the ways in which different actors (researchers or participants) experience PWR. Awareness of social-ecological context and critical reflection on individual and group backgrounds can foster sincere, authentic, and creative research collaborations that support the well-being and goals of diverse participants and communities. We offer a suite of activities PWR practitioners can use to foster awareness of historical conflict context and collaboration, distinct mental models of the system, ecological dynamics, and ownership in research

Agriculture · Agroforestry · Business · Citizen journalism · Common sense · Conservation Agriculture · Environmental ethics · Environmental planning · Environmental resource management · Geography · Participatory action research · Political science · Sociology · Agriculture and Rural Development Research · Environmental Science

  • ‘Manure gets into your veins’

    Open Access•Sarah Woodbury, Kirsten Vinyeta et al.•People and Nature•2026

Citations per year1
Citation span2026 - 2026 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae