Intervene or wait? A model evaluating the timing of intervention in conservation conflicts adaptive management under uncertainty

The timing of biodiversity managers’ interventions can be critical to the success of conservation, especially in situations of conflict between conservation objectives and human livelihood, i.e., conservation conflicts. Given the uncertainty associated with complex social-ecological systems and the potentially irreversible consequences of delayed action for biodiversity and livelihoods, managers tend to simply intervene as soon as possible by precaution. However, refraining from intervening when the situation allows can be beneficial, notably by saving critical management resources. We introduce a strategy for managers to decide, based on monitoring, whether intervention is required or if waiting is possible. This study evaluates the performance of this waiting strategy compared to a strategy of unconditional intervention at every opportunity. We built an individual-based model of conservation conflict between a manager aiming to conserve an animal population and farmers aiming to maximize yield by protecting their crop from wildlife damage. We then simulated a budget-constrained adaptive management over time applying each strategy, while accounting for uncertainty around population dynamics and around decision making of managers and farmers. Our results showed that when the decision for the manager to intervene was based on a prediction of population trajectory, the waiting strategy performed at least as well as unconditional intervention while also allowing managers to save resources by avoiding unnecessary interventions. Under difficult budgetary constraints on managers, this waiting strategy ensured as high yields as unconditional intervention while significantly improving conservation outcomes by compensating managers’ lack of resources with the benefits accrued over waiting periods. This suggests that waiting strategies are worth considering in conservation conflicts because they can facilitate equitable management with a more efficient use of management resources, which are often limiting in biodiversity conservation

Adaptive Management · Agriculture · Business · Economics · Environmental economics · Environmental resource management · Livelihood · Population · Psychological intervention · Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management · Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies · Economic and Environmental Valuation · Ecology

• Biological annihilation via the ongoing sixth mass extinction signaled by vertebrate population losses and declines

  Open Access•Gerardo Ceballos, P R Ehrlich et al.•Proceedings of the National…•2017

  Add to list

• Human–Wildlife Conflict and Coexistence

  Open Access•Philip J Nyhus, Philip Nyhus•Annual Review of Environment and…•2016

  Add to list

• An interdisciplinary review of current and future approaches to improving human–predator relations

  Open Access•Siân Pooley, Merry Barua et al.•Conservation Biology•2017

  Add to list

• Experimental evidence for conservation conflict interventions

  Open Access•O Sarobidy Rakotonarivo, Isabel L Jones et al.•People and Nature•2021

  Add to list

• Impacts of Wildlife on Household Food Security and Income in Northeastern Tanzania

  Abiud Kaswamila, Shaun Russell et al.•Human Dimensions of Wildlife•2007

  Add to list

• The role of incentive-based instruments and social equity in conservation conflict interventions

  Open Access•Sarobidy O Rakotonarivo, Andrew Reid Bell et al.•Conservation Ecology•2021

  Add to list