How does Diversity Matter? The Case of Brazilian River Basin Councils

Dados Bibliográficos

ID4239095
AutoresAndrew Reid Bell (0000-0002-1164-312X, Earth Island Institute), Nathan Lee Engle, Maria Carmen Lemos (0000-0001-6686-730X, Michigan Department of Natural Resources)
Ano2011
Volume16
Fascículo1
Páginasart42
Data de publicação2011-01-01
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoConservation Ecology (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 1195-5449 • E-ISSN: 1708-3087
EditoraResilience Alliance (PUBLISHER • CA)
DOI10.5751/es-04019-160142
OpenAlexW2288704057
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas4
Referências citadas10

Diversity as a concept has often been perceived as a positive system attribute to pursue and protect. However, in some social settings, the way different kinds of diversity shape outcomes can vary significantly. Diversity of ideas and individuals sometimes can lead to disagreement and conflict, which in turn can lead to both positive and negative outcomes. In this study, we examine identity diversity, i.e., age, income, education, worldviews, etc., within the context of Brazilian water governance. We find that within the basins studied in this project, first, the more diversity in organizations and the sectors represented on the council, the more council members participate in council activities, perceive decision making to be democratic, and perceive technical information to facilitate decision making. Second, diversity in what members perceive to be the most pressing problems facing the basin and also diversity in worldviews often correlate negatively with some measures of participation and the perceived importance of technical knowledge. Third, diversity in the level of experience with water issues negatively correlates with some measures of participation and perceived democratic decision making. Fourth, diversity in the perception of the most important problem facing the basin leads to poorer outcomes in the council. Our work provides an argument for supporting broad sectoral representation of interests within deliberative decision making bodies; however, it also illustrates that it is critical for these bodies to explore ways to resolve basic disagreements about the most important problems that need to be addressed and where their collective efforts should be focused

Biology · Environmental planning · Environmental resource management · Geography · Geomorphology · Political science · Structural basin · Environmental Science · Water resources management and optimization · Ecology · Geology