Visual representations in a choice experiment
Valuing Preferences for a Local Dam
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 4239100 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Todd Guilfoos (0000-0001-6062-7049, University of Rhode Island), Simona Trandafir (University of Rhode Island), Priya Thomas, Priya Treesa Thomas (0000-0003-2421-7303, University of Rhode Island), Emi Uchida (0000-0001-6818-2849, University of Rhode Island), Emily Vogler (0000-0001-6857-3946, Rhode Island School of Design) |
| Year | 2023 |
| Volume | 28 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Publication date | 2023-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Conservation Ecology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1195-5449 • E-ISSN: 1708-3087 |
| Publisher | Resilience Alliance (PUBLISHER • CA) |
| DOI | 10.5751/es-13898-280145 |
| OpenAlex | W4352976810 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 23 |
Making decisions about future environmental alternatives such as aging dams can be complex, technical, and challenging for the public. This study uses a split sample, labeled choice experiment to examine how information delivery method—combinations of text, images, and video—affects willingness to pay (WTP) for alternative scenarios for an aging dam. The results indicate that the still image treatment leads to higher WTP across all dam modification alternatives compared to keeping the dam in its current condition. In contrast, the video treatment leads in lower WTP for most alternatives and results in different preference ranking for dam management, i.e., higher WTP to maintain the dam over removing it. Our study suggests that preferences are sensitive to how information is delivered and reinforces the need for credible and legitimate visualizations that can correctly capture the projected future alternatives
Economics · Environmental economics · Environmental resource management · Microeconomics · Preference · Willingness to pay · Computer Science · Economic and Environmental Valuation · Urban Planning and Valuation · Water resources management and optimization · Artificial Intelligence
Structured Decision Making
Do Hypothetical and Actual Marginal Willingness to Pay Differ in Choice Experiments?
A comparison of approaches to estimating confidence intervals for willingness to pay measures
Economic Choices
Constructing Experimental Designs for Discrete-Choice Experiments
Design efficiency for non‐market valuation with choice modelling
Are Choice Experiments Incentive Compatible? A Test with Quality Differentiated Beef Steaks
Disruption to place attachment and the protection of restorative environments
Sense of Place as an Attitude
River restoration by dam removal
Assuring finite moments for willingness to pay in random coefficient models
Mixed Logit with Repeated Choices
Unpacking “Participation” in the Adaptive Management of Social–ecological Systems
The contribution of sense of place to social-ecological systems research
How Do Visual Representations Influence Survey Responses? Evidence from a Choice Experiment on Landscape Attributes of Green Infrastructure
A test of policy labels in environmental choice modelling studies
How Best to Present Complex Ecosystem Information in Stated Preference Studies
Visualisations in Choice Experiments
Critical Regionalism
Preferences and values for afforestation
You kill the dam, you are killing a part of me”
Contrasting visions of science in ecological restoration
"The "Visual Preference Heuristic
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1 |
| Citation span | 2024 - 2026 (3) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |