Redd+ and Human Rights
Addressing Synergies between International Regimes
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 4239219 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Annalisa Savaresi (0000-0002-4255-3696, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2013 |
| Volume | 18 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Publication date | 2013-01-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Conservation Ecology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1195-5449 • E-ISSN: 1708-3087 |
| Publisher | Resilience Alliance (PUBLISHER • CA) |
| DOI | 10.5751/es-05549-180305 |
| OpenAlex | W2035763864 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 18 |
| References cited | 3 |
The making of the REDD+ mechanism in the framework of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) has raised specific concerns on how to reconcile incentives for forest carbon sequestration with the protection of the rights of the numerous communities that rely upon forests for their livelihood, shelter, and survival. Although the nascent REDD+ mechanism provides an opportunity to provide multiple benefits, the design of a framework to secure such benefits and avoid perverse outcomes has proven complex. I provide an overview of progress toward the establishment of such framework, arguing that concerns over the social impact of REDD+ activities may be addressed by resorting to clearer and stronger links with human rights instruments
Agriculture · Business · Climate change · Climate change mitigation · Conference of the parties · Convention · Economics · Environmental planning · Environmental resource management · Geography · Human rights · Incentive · Kyoto Protocol · Livelihood · Natural resource economics · Political science · United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change · Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management · Forest Management and Policy · Sustainability and Climate Change Governance · Ecology
Litigio Climático y Derechos Humanos en el Sur Global. Apuntes para el debate
Seeing the forest for the trees
Beyond Carbon
Uncertainty in Estimates, Incentives, and Emission Reductions in Redd+ Projects
Incorporating international biodiversity law principles and rights perspective into the European Union Timber Regulation
Ending slavery by decarbonisation? Exploring the nexus of modern slavery, deforestation, and climate change action via Redd
Rights-based approaches to climate decision-making
Principles to gain a social licence to operate for green initiatives and biodiversity projects
Redd + research
Can Redd+ social safeguards reach the ‘right’ people? Lessons from Madagascar
Rebalancing state and Indigenous sovereignties in international law
Subjects of injustice
Do deforestation reduction policies meet the needs for environmental justice in the Democratic Republic of the Congo
Redd+ on the rocks? Conflict Over Forest and Politics of Justice in Vietnam
Overestimation of mitigation leads to underestimation of residual impacts
Structural exploitation in the Colombian Amazon
Mind the Compliance Gap
Human Rights in the Paris Agreement
| Citations per year | 1.5 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2014 - 2026 (13) |
| Highly cited | No |