Place-based knowledge transfer in a local-to-global and knowledge-to-action context

Key Steps and Facilitative Factors

Bibliographic Data

ID4239240
AuthorsEva Sievers (0000-0003-0097-5177, Leiden University), Marja Spierenburg (0000-0003-0128-1900, Leiden University), Shivant Jhagroe (0000-0002-1487-9242, Leiden University), Alexander Van Oudenhoven, Alexander P E van Oudenhoven (0000-0002-3258-2565, Leiden University)
Year2024
Volume29
Issue3
Publication date2024-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueConservation Ecology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1195-5449 • E-ISSN: 1708-3087
PublisherResilience Alliance (PUBLISHER • CA)
DOI10.5751/es-15024-290308
OpenAlexW4400914423
LanguageEN
Citations received6
References cited54

Rapid global change threatens to outstrip global efforts to establish sustainable stewardship of social-ecological systems (SES). Place-based research can enhance effectiveness of global sustainability policies and actions by providing contextualized knowledge underpinning bottom-up solutions. However, the use and transfer of place-based knowledge remains a major challenge. In this study, we analyze place-based knowledge transfer in a local-to-global and knowledge-to-action context. We aim to provide insights on when, how, and why place-based research can inform decision making at the global scale and lead to action toward more sustainable and just futures. Our iterative and exploratory methodology involved alternating rounds of literature reviews and interviews with interdisciplinary researchers. We identified four key steps (place-based knowledge production, knowledge synthesis, knowledge use at the global scale, and knowledge revision and lessons learned) and five facilitative factors (bridging organizations, knowledge brokers, boundary organizations, institutionalized knowledge governance, and polycentric governance systems), which provide a comprehensive understanding of place-based knowledge transfer. Our conceptual framework provides suggestions on how to set up place-based knowledge transfer to be more effective, complete, and inclusive. Furthermore, our study discusses two major structural challenges that currently inhibit place-based knowledge transfer and shows ways forward for science and policy to overcome these. We argue that place-based knowledge transfer can be an effective means to undo dominant power relations and the epistemic status quo and enable a shift from short-termism in science and policy toward more long-term SES goals. Therefore, it is seminal to open up the predominant value system to more diverse knowledge systems, signifying a shift away from global decision making that is guided by neoliberal capitalist principles and over-emphasizes short-term and individual gains. Finally, it is crucial to prioritize learning over knowing to exploit the long-term value of place-based knowledge transfer

Business · Corporate governance · Domain knowledge · Knowledge integration · Knowledge management · Knowledge transfer · Sustainability · Computer Science · Environmental Education and Sustainability · Sustainability and Climate Change Governance · Sustainability in Higher Education

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access