Motivations and sensitivities surrounding the illegal trade of sea turtles in Costa Rica
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 4239282 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Helen Pheasey (0000-0001-9320-8334), Richard A Griffiths (0000-0002-5533-1013), Richard Griffiths (0000-0001-5550-9101), Eleni Matechou (0000-0003-3626-844X), David L Roberts (0000-0001-6788-2691), David Roberts (0000-0002-5669-5011) |
| Year | 2023 |
| Volume | 28 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Publication date | 2023-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Conservation Ecology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1195-5449 • E-ISSN: 1708-3087 |
| Publisher | Resilience Alliance (PUBLISHER • CA) |
| DOI | 10.5751/es-14296-280415 |
| OpenAlex | W4388651717 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 9 |
Illegal wildlife trade can threaten biodiversity and economic development. Criminal enterprises may add wildlife products to their list of illicit goods by using established trade routes, networks, and individuals. On the Caribbean coast of Costa Rica, killing of sea turtles and removal of their eggs is commonplace. However, beyond conservation NGOs reporting evidence of illegal take, little is known about this activity. Through semi-structured interviews with law enforcement, community members, NGOs, and illegal harvesters, alongside anecdotal information and observations, we aimed to understand the motivations for illegal take. To cross-reference these findings, we assessed sensitivities surrounding illegal harvesting by asking the general public sensitive questions using the randomized response technique; a method used to elicit sensitive information whilst insuring the anonymity of respondents. We included a questionnaire to establish if differences in demographics affected the probability respondents would admit to a turtle-related crime. Our findings identified a rare example of illegal extraction of a wildlife product driven by motivations that were not exclusively livelihood based. We found the majority of illegal take was undertaken by relatively few individuals, dependent on narcotics. The most cited reason for illegal take was that turtle eggs could be used to procure drugs. Law enforcement was under resourced, and informants reported that prosecutions were rare. Local people preferred to purchase rather than harvest eggs suggesting the trade is supply-driven. Those interviewed did not generally regard the subject of illegal harvest as sensitive. Low education levels, high unemployment rates, and marginalization of certain groups may increase susceptibility to narcotics. Although substance misuse and addiction appear to drive illegal trade, associated poverty and marginalization may explain why drug dependency is so prevalent in Caribbean Costa Rica. Increased work opportunities and drug rehabilitation programs may assist in reducing illegal take of turtle eggs on nesting beaches
Bushmeat · Business · Economics · Enforcement · Fishery · Geography · Illegal logging · Law enforcement · Livelihood · Logging · Poaching · Political science · Socioeconomics · Wildlife · Wildlife trade · Law · Social Issues and Policies in Latin America · Turtle Biology and Conservation · Wildlife Conservation and Criminology Analyses · Ecology
How to ask sensitive questions in conservation
Randomized Response
Estimating Illegal Resource Use at a Ugandan Park with the Randomized Response Technique
Ecotourism as a development strategy
Poverty, Pandemics, and Wildlife Crime
Up against the wall
A downward spiral? Research evidence on the relationship between poverty and natural resource degradation
Local Conservation Practice and Global Discourse
To Poach or Not to Poach an Endangered Species
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |