Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Safe operating space for humanity at a regional scale

Bibliographic Data

ID4239356
AuthorsJohn F Mclaughlin (Western Washington University, corresponding author)
Year2018
Volume23
Issue2
Publication date2018-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueConservation Ecology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1195-5449 • E-ISSN: 1708-3087
PublisherResilience Alliance (PUBLISHER • CA)
DOI10.5751/es-10171-230243
OpenAlexW2807834762
LanguageEN
Citations received15
References cited15

The planetary boundaries framework defined safe limits to human impacts on essential Earth-system processes. Subsequent assessments concluded that impacts exceed most delineated boundaries. Societal responses to these results have been insufficient to restore safety. One factor impeding effective action is differences in scale between planetary boundaries and national, regional, or local scales where many impacts and solutions originate. I have contributed toward a resolution by developing a regional scale framework and an approach to translate boundaries across spatial scales. I developed the framework for a county and river basin in the Pacific Northwest. The framework includes six state variables related to planetary scale analogues. Boundary translation can be achieved by aggregating hydrologic processes across scales. Because of greater process certainty and lower spatial heterogeneity at the regional scale, regional boundaries can be defined with more precision than global analogues. The region has exceeded five boundaries and is close to the remaining one. Effects of existing and proposed policies will be to exceed boundaries further. Likely consequences include irreversible degradation in river functions, severe water shortages, impaired water quality, human health impacts, and extinctions of iconic salmonids. In most cases, policy and enforcement mechanisms to restore conditions within regional boundaries are in place, but they have been ignored or misapplied. New initiatives with potential to restore safety are being pursued by indigenous peoples, who also are most directly affected by boundary transgression. By clearly delineating regional boundaries and identifying consequences of boundary transgression, this framework may complement indigenous efforts with policy imperatives for other stakeholders in the region

Cartography · Environmental resource management · Geography · Humanity · Political science · Computer Science · Engineering Diagnostics and Reliability · Environmental Science · Ergonomics and Human Factors · Industrial Engineering and Technologies · Law

  • Exploring landowners' perceptions, motivations and needs for voluntary conservation in a cultural landscape

    Open Access•Gonzalo Cortés‐Capano, Tuuli Toivonen et al.•People and Nature•2020

  • The Boundaries of the Planetary Boundary Framework

    Open Access•Felix Biermann, Frank Biermann et al.•Annual Review of Environment and…•2020

  • Approaches for aggregating data from the regional to the global level

    Open Access•Eldbjørg Blikra Vea, Katherine Richardson et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2025

  • Matching scope, purpose and uses of planetary boundaries science

    Open Access•Andrea S Downing, Avit Kumar Bhowmik et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2019

  • Integrated modeling of urban water metabolism and ecosystem services

    Open Access•Sina Sadri-Shojaei, Marzieh Momeni et al.•Sustainable Cities and Society•2025

  • Securing the social foundation

    Open Access•Jonathan Ensor, Eric Hoddy•Earth System Governance•2020

  • Downscaling doughnut economics for sustainability governance

    Open Access•Rachel A Turner, Jane Wills•Current Opinion in Environmental…•2022

  • Push and pull in the sustainable development of ecological landscape and ecological resources

    Open Access•Kui Yi, Jing Zhu et al.•Sustainable Development•2023

  • How close are European countries to the doughnut-shaped safe and just space? Evidence from 26 EU countries

    Open Access•María Rosario Gómez-Alvarez Díaz, Víctor Ernesto Pérez León et al.•Ecological Economics•2024

  • A framework to allocate responsibilities of the global environmental concerns

    Open Access•Brais Suárez-Eiroa, Emilio Fernandez et al.•Ecological Economics•2021

  • Assessing global agri-food system exceedance of national cropland limits for linking responsible consumption and production under SDG 12

    Open Access•M Abdullah Shaikh, Michalis Hadjikakou et al.•Ecological Economics•2023

  • Challenges and opportunities for operationalizing the safe and just operating space concept at regional scale

    Md Sarwar Hossain, Chinwe Ifejika Speranza•International Journal of…•2020

  • Sharing the safe operating space

    Open Access•Anjila Wegge Hjalsted, Alexis Laurent et al.•Journal of Industrial Ecology•2021

  • Planetary Boundaries and the Doughnut frameworks

    Open Access•Anna Ferretto, Robin Matthews et al.•Anthropocene•2022

  • Re-grounding cumulative effects assessments in ecological resilience

    Open Access•Corrie Greaves, Lael Parrott•Environmental Impact Assessment…•2024

  • The Natural Flow Regime

    N Leroy Poff, J David Allan et al.•BioScience•1997

  • Approaching a state shift in Earth’s biosphere

    Open Access•Anthony D Barnosky, Elizabeth A Hadly et al.•Nature•2012

  • Anticipating Critical Transitions

    Open Access•Marten Scheffer, R Carpenter et al.•Science•2012

  • Global Consequences of Land Use

    Open Access•Jonathan A Foley, Ruth Defries et al.•Science•2005

  • Planetary boundaries

    Open Access•Will Steffen, Katherine Richardson et al.•Science•2015

  • A safe operating space for humanity

    Open Access•Johan Rockström, Will Steffen et al.•Nature•2009

  • Allocating a 2 °C cumulative carbon budget to countries

    Open Access•Renaud Gignac, H Damon Matthews•Environmental Research Letters•2015

  • Towards a revised planetary boundary for consumptive freshwater use

    Open Access•Dieter Gerten, Holger Hoff et al.•Current Opinion in Environmental…•2013

  • Spatial variability in sustainable development trajectories in South Africa

    Open Access•Megan J Cole, Richard M Bailey et al.•Sustainability Science•2017

  • Safe and just operating spaces for regional social-ecological systems

    Open Access•John A Dearing, Rong Wang et al.•Global Environmental Change•2014

  • From Planetary Boundaries to national fair shares of the global safe operating space — How can the scales be bridged

    Open Access•Tiina Häyhä, Patrick Lucas et al.•Global Environmental Change•2016

  • Methods and approaches to modelling the Anthropocene

    Open Access•Peter H Verburg, John A Dearing et al.•Global Environmental Change•2015

  • Institutions for managing global climate change

    Open Access•David L Feldman•Global Environmental Change•1992

  • Haida Marine Planning

    Open Access•Russ Jones, Catherine Riggs et al.•Conservation Ecology•2010

  • Planetary Boundaries

    Open Access•Johan Rockström, Will Steffen et al.•Conservation Ecology•2009

Unique citing works15
Citations per year2,14
Citation span2019 - 2025 (7)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 14

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae