Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Multistakeholder environmental governance in action

Redd+ discourse coalitions in Tanzania

Bibliographic Data

ID4239750
AuthorsSalla Rantala (0000-0002-8135-4569, University of Helsinki), Monica Di Gregorio (0000-0003-2545-217X, University of Leeds)
Year2014
Volume19
Issue2
Pagesart66
Publication date2014-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueConservation Ecology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1195-5449 • E-ISSN: 1708-3087
PublisherResilience Alliance (PUBLISHER • CA)
DOI10.5751/es-06536-190266
OpenAlexW2148595801
LanguageEN
Citations received24
References cited22

Rantala, S., and M. Di Gregorio. 2014. Multistakeholder environmental governance in action: REDD+ discourse coalitions in Tanzania. Ecology and Society 19(2): 66. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-06536-190266

Business · Collective action · Corporate governance · Economics · Environmental ethics · Environmental governance · Environmental planning · Environmental resource management · Geography · Political science · Politics · Tanzania · Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management · International Development and Aid · Sustainability and Climate Change Governance

  • Institutionalization of Redd+ MRV in Indonesia, Peru, and Tanzania

    Open Access•Robert M Ochieng, Bas Arts et al.•Conservation Ecology•2018

  • Redd+ policy networks

    Open Access•Maria Brockhaus, Monica Di Gregorio et al.•Conservation Ecology•2014

  • National Redd+ policy networks

    Open Access•Maria Brockhaus, Monica Di Gregorio•Conservation Ecology•2014

  • Water Governance in Vale Do Paraíba Paulista

    Open Access•Alexandre R Marques, Maria Angélica Toniolo et al.•Ambiente & sociedade•2020

  • Effectiveness of policy instrument mixes for forest conservation in the tropics – Stakeholder perceptions from Ecuador, the Philippines and Zambia

    Open Access•Richard Fischer, Melvin Lippe et al.•Land Use Policy•2023

  • Forest Conservation Through Markets? A Discourse Network Analysis of the Debate on Funding Mechanisms for Redd+ in Brazil

    C Schulz•Environmental Communication•2020

  • The transnational policy process for Redd+ and domestic policy entrepreneurship in developing countries

    Open Access•Sébastien Jodoin•Environment and Planning C…•2017

  • Competing narratives of nature-based solutions

    Open Access•Marina Stavroula Melanidis, Shannon Hagerman•Environmental Science & Policy•2022

  • The political rationalities of governing deforestation in Colombia

    Open Access•Darío Gerardo Zambrano-Cortés, Jelle Behagel et al.•Forest Policy and Economics•2023

  • The structure and pattern of global partnerships in the Redd+ mechanism

    Open Access•Seongmin Shin, Mi Sun Park et al.•Forest Policy and Economics•2021

  • International influence on forest governance in Tanzania

    Open Access•Susanne Koch•Forest Policy and Economics•2016

  • Sustainable management of forest in view of media attention to Redd + policy, opportunity and impact in Cambodia

    Open Access•Sareth Nhem, Young Jin Lee et al.•Forest Policy and Economics•2017

  • Multi-level governance and power in climate change policy networks

    Open Access•Monica Di Gregorio, Leandra Fatorelli et al.•Global Environmental Change•2018

  • Framing national Redd+ benefits, monitoring, governance and finance

    Open Access•Marjanneke J Vijge, Maria Brockhaus et al.•Global Environmental Change•2016

  • Transnational Legal Process and Discourse in Environmental Governance

    Open Access•Sébastien Jodoin•Law & Social Inquiry•2019

  • Transnational Markets for Sustainable Development Governance

    Open Access•Caleb Gallemore, Kine Jespersen et al.•World Development•2016

  • Promising Change, Delivering Continuity

    Open Access•Jens Friis Lund, Eliezeri Sungusia et al.•World Development•2016

  • The Construction of an Environmental Villain

    Open Access•Pin Pravalprukskul, Cecilie Friis et al.•Asia Pacific Viewpoint•2026

  • Creating property out of insecurity

    Melis Ece•The Journal of Legal Pluralism…•2021

  • Neoliberal conservation in Redd

    Open Access•Jichuan Sheng, Hong Qiu et al.•Land Use Policy•2019

  • She’s a Rainbow

    Open Access•Eulàlia Baulenas•Land Use Policy•2021

  • Understanding Government Agrarian Programs and Smallholder Perspectives on Forest Cover Dynamics in Mexico’s Mesoamerican Biological Corridor

    Open Access•Alana M Rader, B Schmook et al.•Geographical Review•2025

  • Private and public authority interactions and the functional quality of sustainability governance

    Open Access•Stefano Pontes, Christine Noe et al.•Regulation & Governance•2021

  • Nothing succeeds like success narratives

    Hanne Svarstad, Tor A Benjaminsen•Journal of Eastern African Studies•2017

  • Social network analysis

    John Scott•Social network analysis•1991

  • Comparing Policy Networks

    Open Access•David Knoke, Franz Urban Pappi et al.•Comparing Policy Networks•1996

  • The Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis and Planning

    Open Access•Frank Fischer, John Forester•Argumentative Turn in Policy…•1993

  • Does Redd+ Threaten to Recentralize Forest Governance?

    Open Access•John Phelps, Jacob Phelps et al.•Science•2010

  • CO2 emissions from forest loss

    Open Access•Guido R van der Werf, Douglas C Morton et al.•Nature Geoscience•2009

  • Discourse Coalitions and the Institutionalization of Practice

    Maarten A Hajer•Argumentative Turn in Policy…•2002

  • Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification

    Open Access•Linton C Freeman•Social Networks•1978

  • Network analysis of 2-mode data

    Open Access•P Borgatti, Stephen P Borgatti et al.•Social Networks•1997

  • The evolution of Redd

    Jan Willem den Besten, Bas Arts et al.•Environmental Science & Policy•2013

  • Implementing Redd

    Open Access•Peter Kanowski, Peter J Kanowski et al.•Environmental Science & Policy•2010

  • Forests policy analysis and theory use

    Open Access•Bas Arts•Forest Policy and Economics•2011

  • Forests, discourses, institutions

    Open Access•Bas Arts, Marleen Buizer•Forest Policy and Economics•2008

  • Governing the design of national Redd

    Open Access•Maria Brockhaus, Monica Di Gregorio et al.•Forest Policy and Economics•2013

  • Autonomy, ambiguity and symbolism in African politics

    Open Access•Alan Grainger, William Konteh•Land Use Policy•2007

  • Comparative analysis of policy networks in Western Europe

    Hanspeter Kriesi, Silke Adam et al.•Journal of European Public Policy•2006

  • Political discourse networks and the conflict over software patents in Europe

    Open Access•Philip Leifeld, Sebastian Haun•European Journal of Political…•2012

  • Where Does Political Polarization Come From? Locating Polarization Within the U.S. Climate Change Debate

    Open Access•Dana R Fisher, Joseph Waggle et al.•American Behavioral Scientist•2013

  • Power and Conflict in the Swiss Political Elite

    Open Access•Manuel Fischer, Alex Fischer et al.•Swiss Political Science Review•2009

  • Combining Policy Network and Model-Based Scenario Analyses

    Open Access•Christian Hirschi, Alexander Widmer et al.•Conservation Ecology•2013

  • Framing Processes and Social Movements

    Robert D Benford, David A Snow•Annual Review of Sociology•2000

  • Community-Elite Influence Structures

    Edward O Laumann, P V Marsden et al.•American Journal of Sociology•1977

Unique citing works24
Citations per year2
Citation span2014 - 2026 (13)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 19

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae