Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

State-reinforced co-provision of community-governed greenspace in racially marginalized neighborhoods

Lessons from Chicago's innovative NeighborSpace Land Trust and Partnership

Bibliographic Data

ID4239787
AuthorsDaniel Decaro, Daniel A Decaro (0000-0003-3869-4530), Emmanuel Frimpong Boamah (0000-0002-6608-9170), Mary Rudolph, Gifty Amma Adusei
Year2025
Volume30
Issue2
Publication date2025-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueConservation Ecology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1195-5449 • E-ISSN: 1708-3087
PublisherResilience Alliance (PUBLISHER • CA)
DOI10.5751/es-15783-300202
OpenAlexW4409161706
LanguageEN

Racially marginalized neighborhoods lack public goods, such as greenspace, because of civic disenfranchisement and failed provisioning by local governments. The governance systems and adaptive and/or transformative capacities needed to overcome these dilemmas are poorly understood. We used the State-Reinforced Self-Governance (SRSG) Framework to examine an innovative solution to the greenspace problem. In 1996, Chicago’s Mayor, Park District, and Forest Preserve District created NeighborSpace—a successful trans-governmental non-profit land trust organization and cooperative partnership. The NeighborSpace partnership ensures equitable and efficient greenspace access and management via self-governing arrangements and community-based governance. To understand the design features that enable this solution, we examined the federal, state, and local policies that created the NeighborSpace partnership and grant its formal powers. We also interviewed key stakeholders governing the NeighborSpace partnership. NeighborSpace’s status as a formally recognized trans-governmental non-profit land trust generates considerable benefits for co-provision and co-production. These benefits stem from many design features, most notably NeighborSpace’s: (a) authority to make constitutional and administrative decisions via self-governance, (b) capacity to coordinate diverse stakeholders via Ostrom’s design principles for multi-actor cooperation, and (c) operational capacities to efficiently acquire, protect, and transfer land for community-based governance. This solution exemplifies principles of adaptive and transformative governance via SRSG, providing critical theoretical and practical lessons about the mechanisms that enable successful co-provision and co-production

Economic growth · Economics · General partnership · Political science · Sociology · Law · Public Administration · Urban Agriculture and Sustainability · Urban Green Space and Health · Urban Planning and Landscape Design

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae