Inclusion in body and mind
Ensuring full participation of Indigenous peoples and local communities in decisions related to nature
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 4239802 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Suneetha M Subramanian (0000-0003-2516-2412), Suneetha Subramanian, Eszter Kelemen (0000-0002-6409-1883), A De Vos (0000-0002-9085-4012), Torsten Krause (0000-0002-2554-1503), Melissa Mayhew, Aroha Mead, Aroha Te Pareake Mead (0000-0002-6280-9441), Emmanuel Nuesiri, Jessica Perritt, Mine Islar (0000-0001-9479-4734), Sacha Amaruzaman (0000-0003-4699-3450), Gabriela Arroyo-Robles (0000-0002-3752-5500), Barbara Nakangu, Tuyeni H Mwampamba (0000-0003-4635-5774), Marina Kosmus, Luciana Porter-Bolland (0000-0001-8586-3267), Evonne Yiu, Anna Vargas (0000-0001-7252-5648), Anna Varga (0000-0001-9900-0489) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 30 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Publication date | 2025-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Conservation Ecology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1195-5449 • E-ISSN: 1708-3087 |
| Publisher | Resilience Alliance (PUBLISHER • CA) |
| DOI | 10.5751/es-16300-300313 |
| OpenAlex | W4412720569 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 4 |
The inclusion of the knowledge and perspectives of Indigenous peoples and local communities (IPLC) in global sciencepolicy processes are increasingly being mandated. This is indicative of the recognition of their expertise and worldviews to inform social and ecological decisions. The IPBES Values Assessment (VA) explicitly highlighted the necessity for a nuanced engagement of different actors while undertaking valuation for decisions related to nature. In this paper we further reflect on the findings of Chapter 6 of the VA that focused on operationalizing diverse values approaches in policy. We examine how IPLC are consulted and their values included in sectoral and cross-sectoral policies interlinked with biodiversity. We specifically share IPLC experiences of the IPBES process based on personal reflections of a participating Indigenous scholar. Apart from emphasizing the pitfalls of excluding diverse IPLC values of nature from decision making, our review also discusses how IPLC perspectives are represented within global forums, and particularly in IPBES processes. Our analysis reveals that meaningful IPLC inclusion pertains to representation of knowledge (mind) and of active participation and agency to bring their networks into the discourse (body). While highlighting some major deficiencies of the current decision-making practices (e.g., lack of pluralistic and inclusive processes, human and financial resources, or culturally sensitive processes) that preclude the full and effective inclusion of IPLC, we offer promising approaches, specifically engaging reflexivity and learning, that can address these deficiencies and move toward ensuring higher representation of IPLC by and for themselves
Economic growth · Economics · Environmental planning · Environmental resource management · Geography · Indigenous · Political science · Socioeconomics · Sociology · Environmental law and policy · Environmental Science · Gender Studies · Ecology
| Unique citing works | 4 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 4 |
| Citation span | 2025 - 2026 (2) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 4 |