Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Impacts of harvested species declines on Indigenous Peoples' food sovereignty, well-being and ways of life

A case study of Anishinaabe perspectives and moose

Bibliographic Data

ID4240213
AuthorsPauline Priadka (0000-0003-1204-3449, University of Guelph), Brittany Moses, Cory Kozmik, Steven Kell, Jesse N Popp (0000-0002-7297-4838, University of Guelph)
Year2022
Volume27
Issue1
Publication date2022-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueConservation Ecology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1195-5449 • E-ISSN: 1708-3087
PublisherResilience Alliance (PUBLISHER • CA)
DOI10.5751/es-12995-270130
OpenAlexW4226064609
LanguageEN
Citations received4
References cited26

Global declines in wildlife are increasing the vulnerability of Indigenous communities to food insecurity. Meanwhile, many colonial policies continue to ignore social-ecological relationships that have traditionally maintained a balance between wildlife and Indigenous Peoples’ subsistence needs. We provide a case study on perspectives and insights from three Anishinaabe Nations in Ontario, Canada on the importance of a traditional food, moose ( mooz [Nishnaabemowin]; Alces alces ), and how changes in the moose population are affecting food security, well-being, and ways of life. In partnership with each Nation, we conducted interviews with community members and related observations on change in the moose population to estimates of moose abundance and non-Indigenous harvest collected by the Ontario provincial government over a 16-year time frame (2001–2016). Moose was described as important for subsistence needs as well as for maintaining Anishinabek culture, traditions, and identity within each community. A decline in the moose population was observed by most participants, which corresponded with provincial data on moose abundance. Additionally, the number of non-Indigenous hunters per moose harvested on traditional territories increased linearly over time, and community members expressed concern over how the province was managing moose. The effects of moose decline in the communities included reduced food security and health, increased financial costs due to both relying more on store-bought foods and having to travel further to harvest moose, as well as a decline in the practice of traditions and ceremonies surrounding moose harvest and passing this knowledge on to younger generations. Despite the potential impacts on Indigenous subsistence harvest, there is a lack of collaborative decision-making with Indigenous communities on moose population and harvest management in Ontario. Using community perspectives and insights, we discuss how autonomous moose monitoring can support and facilitate co-management and collaborative decision-making to reinstate Indigenous food sovereignty

Agriculture · Archaeology · Biology · Food security · Geography · Indigenous · Population · Population decline · Population growth · Socioeconomics · Sociology · Subsistence agriculture · Subsistence economy · Wildlife · Demography · Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights · Indigenous Studies and Ecology · Ecology

  • Weaving Indigenous and Western knowledge systems to discern drivers of mooz (moose) population decline

    Open Access•Pauline Priadka, Bassam Moses et al.•People and Nature•2024

  • Farming the North

    Open Access•Sarah Rotz, Daniel Rück et al.•Antipode•2025

  • He Karanga Maha. Investigating Relational Resource Management in Aotearoa, New Zealand

    Open Access•Sarah Rewi, Dan Hikuroa et al.•International Journal of…•2023

  • Rethinking Indigenous Hunting in National Parks

    Open Access•Madison Stevens, Kimberly L Paul et al.•Annals of the American…•2025

  • Ggplot2

    Open Access•Cedric Ginestet, Cedric E Ginestet•Journal of the Royal Statistical…•2011

  • Indigenous ways of knowing and the study of environmental change

    Open Access•F Berkes•Journal of the Royal Society of…•2009

  • Supporting resurgent Indigenous-led governance

    Open Access•Kyle A Artelle, Melanie Zurba et al.•Biological Conservation•2019

  • Evolution of co-management

    Open Access•F Berkes•Journal of Environmental Management•2009

  • “Indigenizing” Food Sovereignty. Revitalizing Indigenous Food Practices and Ecological Knowledges in Canada and the United States

    Open Access•Charlotte Coté•Humanities•2016

  • “That land means everything to us as Anishinaabe….”

    Open Access•Joshua Tobias, Joshua K Tobias et al.•Health & Place•2014

  • Co-management of Traditional Foods

    Open Access•Ainslie Cruickshank, Geranda Notten et al.•ARCTIC•2019

  • A review of Indigenous knowledge and participation in environmental monitoring

    Open Access•Kim‐Ly Thompson, Kim-Ly Thompson et al.•Conservation Ecology•2020

  • Community-based monitoring of Indigenous food security in a changing climate

    Open Access•Steven Lâm, Warren Dodd et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2019

  • Postcolonial healing landscapes and mental health in a remote Indigenous community in subarctic Ontario, Canada

    Alfonso Marquina-Márquez, Jorge Vírchez et al.•Polar Geography•2016

  • The rise of moose co-management and integration of Indigenous knowledge

    Jesse N Popp, Pauline Priadka et al.•Human Dimensions of Wildlife•2018

  • Prevalence and sociodemographic risk factors related to household food security in Aboriginal peoples in Canada

    Open Access•Noreen D Willows, Paul J Veugelers et al.•Public Health Nutrition•2009

  • Drivers and health implications of the dietary transition among Inuit in the Canadian Arctic

    Open Access•Matthew Little, Hilary Hagar et al.•Public Health Nutrition•2021

  • Can indigenous community-based monitoring act as a tool for sustainable self-determination

    Open Access•Graeme Reed, Nicolas D Brunet et al.•The Extractive Industries and…•2020

  • Making room and moving over

    Open Access•Nicole Latulippe, Nicole Klenk•Current Opinion in Environmental…•2019

  • To me, policy is government”

    Open Access•Bonnie Fournier, Kaysi Eastlick Kushner et al.•Health & Place•2019

  • Co-management and the co-production of knowledge

    Open Access•Derek Armitage, F Berkes et al.•Global Environmental Change•2011

  • Indigenous peoples’ nutrition transition in a right to food perspective

    Open Access•Siri Damman, Wenche Barth Eide et al.•Food Policy•2007

  • Revealing circumstances of epidemiologic transition among Indigenous peoples

    Open Access•Paul Hackett, Sylvia Abonyi et al.•Canadian Geographies /…•2021

  • Food sovereignty as decolonization

    Open Access•Stephen Grey, Sam Grey et al.•Agriculture and Human Values•2014

  • "We Might Go Back to This"; Drawing on the Past to Meet the Future in Northwestern North American Indigenous Communities

    Open Access•Nancy J Turner, Nancy Turner et al.•Conservation Ecology•2013

  • Like the plains people losing the buffalo

    Open Access•Charlotte K Whitney, Alejandro Frid et al.•Conservation Ecology•2020

  • Measuring social-ecological resilience reveals opportunities for transforming environmental governance

    Open Access•Anne K Salomon, Allyson E Quinlan et al.•Conservation Ecology•2019

  • Combining Science and Traditional Ecological Knowledge

    Open Access•H Möller, Henrik Møller et al.•Conservation Ecology•2004

  • Letting the leaders pass

    Open Access•Elisabeth Padilla, Gary P Kofinas•Conservation Ecology•2014

  • Farmers, foodies and First Nations

    Annette Aurélie Desmarais, H Wittman•The Journal of Peasant Studies•2014

Unique citing works4
Citations per year1,33
Citation span2023 - 2025 (3)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 2

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae