The Network Governance of Urban River Corridors

Bibliographic Data

ID4240230
AuthorsAlison R Holt (University of Sheffield), Peter Moug (0000-0002-5156-8865, University of Sheffield), David N Lerner (0000-0001-5463-2781, University of Sheffield)
Year2012
Volume17
Issue4
Publication date2012-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueConservation Ecology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1195-5449 • E-ISSN: 1708-3087
PublisherResilience Alliance (PUBLISHER • CA)
DOI10.5751/es-05200-170425
OpenAlexW2313309264
LanguageEN
Citations received22
References cited50

Urban centers can provide important ecosystem services to society both through green spaces and river corridors. However, urbanization has impacted rivers, and as a consequence, there is increasing support for their sustainable management. The governance of urban river corridors reflects a trend toward stakeholder participation and partnership working in urban regeneration. The integration of ecological, social, and economic knowledge required for their sustainable management is achieved through networks of people and organizations that cross multiple sectors. However, little is known about the structure and function of such governance networks. We address this through a case study that explores the network structure of a multistakeholder collaboration tasked with developing a city-wide strategy for the sustainable management of urban river corridors in Sheffield, UK. We combine interpretive policy analysis and social network analysis to reveal the network structure and leadership characteristics of the group. We aim to explain why the group are having difficulty reaching a shared strategic vision for the river corridors and why they feel the group lacks representativeness. Our findings show that the network needs to become better connected to support an ongoing process of deliberation and negotiation for a shared vision. In addition, there is a limited diversity of stakeholders that will affect the legitimacy of the group and their ability to manage for a range of ecosystem services of benefit across society. We conclude that governance processes need to account for a diversity of actors that may change through time, and link regional and city networks to local interests

Business · Corporate governance · Environmental planning · Environmental resource management · Geography · Network governance · Urban network · Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management · Environmental Science · Land Use and Ecosystem Services · Sustainability and Climate Change Governance

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access