Investigating the coordination between ecological and economic systems in China's green development process
A Place-Based Interdisciplinary Evaluation
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 4240430 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Kai-Di Liu, Kaidi Liu (0009-0009-8950-6342), Xi Xiong (0000-0002-2660-2435), Wenjing Xiang (0009-0003-3407-389X), Shuyao Wu (0000-0002-0057-5483), Dongsheng Shi (0000-0002-5701-9795), Wentao Zhang (0000-0001-6340-7551), Linbo Zhang (0000-0002-6771-5727) |
| Year | 2023 |
| Volume | 28 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Publication date | 2023-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Conservation Ecology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1195-5449 • E-ISSN: 1708-3087 |
| Publisher | Resilience Alliance (PUBLISHER • CA) |
| DOI | 10.5751/es-13724-280143 |
| OpenAlex | W4328025798 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 12 |
Harmonizing human activities with the natural environment has received much attention as a development goal and is a longstanding pursuit of human society. In this study, we investigated the sustainability of green development from the perspective of the coordination between economic and environmental subsystems at the place-based scale, with 290 cities in China as research objects. An interdisciplinary method combining an improved data envelopment analysis model and Lotka-Volterra model was conducted to examine the two subsystems’ development efficiency and their correlation (i.e., mutualism, commensalism, amensalism, sacrifice, competition, independence). The results indicate that one-third of the cities’ economic and environmental subsystems are in a mutualistic state, with a relatively stable social-ecological system. However, the two subsystems are in a state of competition in one-fourth of the cities, with rather intense vulnerability, where the harmonious coexistence of humans and nature is facing more significant challenges. In addition, vulnerability of the social-ecological system in economically developed cities shows substantial polarization. The two subsystems in most of these cities are in mutualism or amensalism relations, whereas the social-ecological system in economically underdeveloped cities shows even greater vulnerability
China · Economic system · Economics · Environmental resource management · Geography · Sustainability · Computer Science · Energy, Environment, Economic Growth · Land Use and Ecosystem Services · Sustainability and Ecological Systems Analysis · Ecology
How technological innovation impacts urban green economy efficiency in emerging economies
A social-ecological systems approach for environmental management
Emergence, institutionalization and renewal
Modeling the role of environmental regulations in regional green economy efficiency of China
A General Framework for Analyzing Sustainability of Social-Ecological Systems
The Struggle to Govern the Commons
Complexity of Coupled Human and Natural Systems
Application of Grey Lotka-Volterra Model in Water-Economy-Industry-Technology Innovation System in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region
The challenge of adapting marine social–ecological systems to the additional stress of climate change
Understanding adaptation
Biodiversity governance and social-ecological system dynamics
Social-ecological trends
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1 |
| Citation span | 2024 - 2026 (3) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 1 |