Social-ecological systems influence ecosystem service perception
A Programme on Ecosystem Change and Society (Pecs) analysis
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 4240486 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Cristina Quintas-Soriano, Cristina Quintas‐soriano (0000-0002-3437-7629, Idaho State University), Joan Brandt (0000-0002-1954-5997, Boise State University), Jodi S Brandt, Katrina Running (0000-0002-1577-4653, Idaho State University), Colden V Baxter (0000-0003-1383-1412, Idaho State University), Dainee M Gibson (Idaho State University), Jenna Narducci (Boise State University), Antonio J Castro, Antonio Arjona Castro (0000-0003-1587-8564, Idaho State University) |
| Year | 2018 |
| Volume | 23 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | art3 |
| Publication date | 2018-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Conservation Ecology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1195-5449 • E-ISSN: 1708-3087 |
| Publisher | Resilience Alliance (PUBLISHER • CA) |
| DOI | 10.5751/es-10226-230303 |
| OpenAlex | W2883307212 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 49 |
| References cited | 30 |
Quintas-Soriano, C., J. Brandt, K. Running, C. V. Baxter, D. M. Gibson, J. Narducci, and A. J. Castro. 2018. Social-ecological systems influence ecosystem service perception: a Programme on Ecosystem Change and Society (PECS) analysis. Ecology and Society 23(3):3. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-10226-230303
Biology · Business · Ecosystem · Ecosystem services · Environmental resource management · Geography · Perception · Environmental Science · Land Use and Ecosystem Services · Ecology
Assessing the preference and social values for Tea Plantations ecosystem services by stakeholders in Southern Shaanxi, China
Shrub encroachment and stakeholder perceptions of rangeland ecosystem services
Working with or against multifunctional landscapes? A case study of land users' local knowledge of grassland-forest transition zones in northeastern Germany
Not too small to benefit society
Divergent or convergent? Prioritization and spatial representation of ecosystem services as perceived by conservation professionals and local leaders
Ecological worldview, agricultural or natural resource-based activities, and geography affect perceived importance of ecosystem services
The American West as a social-ecological region
Six Collective Challenges for Sustainability of Almería Greenhouse Horticulture
When cultural services and biodiversity matter most
From roots to action
Understanding ecosystem service preferences through human values
Which landscape do you prefer? The role of emotions on choices for landscape management
Variations in stakeholders’ ecosystem service priorities for managing a marine protected area
Non-indigenous species and ecological degradations in Marinas
Marshes to mangroves
Perceptions about mangrove restoration and ecosystem services to inform ecosystem-based restoration in Large Xiamen Bay, China
Public perceptions of multiple ecosystem services from urban agriculture
What is a river basin? Assessing and understanding the sociocultural mental constructs of landscapes from different stakeholders across a river basin
Mapping forest ecosystem service supply in two case studies in Latvia
Linking perceptions of ecological restoration projects’ impacts on ecosystem services and human well-being for achieving regional sustainability
Public perceptions towards urban horticulture in front-yard greenhouses
Navigating trade-offs in the social-ecological systems
Examining concern about climate change and local environmental changes from an ecosystem service perspective in the Western U.S
Analyzing forest residents' perception and knowledge of forest ecosystem services to guide forest management and biodiversity conservation
Valuing ecosystem services of freshwater mussels and fish
A framework for assessing coupling and de-coupling trajectories in river social-ecological systems
The role of emotions in human–nature connectedness within Mediterranean landscapes in Spain
Exploring household preferences for ecosystem services as a basis for strategic land use and conservation planning
A social assessment of ecosystem services
Where and why is landscape considered valuable? Societal actors’ perceptions of ecosystem services across Bavaria (Germany)
Insects contribution to people
Assessing nature’s contributions to people in a peri-urban protected area, southeast Brazil
Green alleys in Quebec provide variable biodiversity support and ecosystem services
Integrating stakeholder preferences into ecosystem services mapping in Yala wetland, Kenya
Cultural worldviews consistently explain bundles of ecosystem service prioritisation across rural Germany
Impact of biophysical characteristics of urban rivers on public perceptions of water‐related ecosystem services
Fishers perceptions of ecosystem service change associated with climate‐disturbed coral reefs
Local valuation of ecosystem services from protected areas along a forest–savanna gradient in West Africa
Unearthing the hidden treasures
Which Ecosystem Services Are Really Integrated into Local Culture? Farmers' Perceptions of the Columbian and Venezuelan Páramos
Assessing the heterogeneity of public acceptability for mangrove restoration through a choice experiment
Farmers' perception and choice preference of grassland ecosystem services
Understanding socio-spatial perceptions and Badlands ecosystem services valuation. Is there any welfare in soil erosion
Integrating preferences and social values for ecosystem services in local ecological management
Land transformation changes people ́s values of ecosystem services in Las Vegas agrarian landscapes of Madrid Spain
Implications of urban growth and farmland loss for ecosystem services in the western United States
Complementary ecosystem services from multiple land uses highlight the importance of tropical mosaic landscapes
An interdisciplinary assessment of private conservation areas in the Western United States
Factors influencing perceptions of aquatic ecosystems
Mapping and Valuing Ecosystem Services as an Approach for Conservation and Natural‐Resource Management
Uncovering Ecosystem Service Bundles through Social Preferences
Environmental Behavior in Cross-National Perspective
Mapping ecosystem service supply, demand and budgets
Explaining Popular Support for Environmental Protection
When we cannot have it all
Operationalizing the social-ecological systems framework to assess sustainability
Trade-offs across value-domains in ecosystem services assessment
Ecosystem service trade-offs from supply to social demand
A General Framework for Analyzing Sustainability of Social-Ecological Systems
The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital
Assessing nature's contributions to people
World Citizenship and Concern for Global Warming
Human–nature connection
The role of fishing material culture in communities’ sense of place as an added-value in management of coastal areas
Global water resources and their management
Interconnected place-based social–ecological research can inform global sustainability
Science–policy interface for addressing environmental problems in arid Spain
Cross-Cultural Perceptions of Water Risks and Solutions Across Select Sites
Resource Use and Ecosystem Services in a Forest Park Landscape
Social and Geographic Contexts of Water Concerns in Utah
Application of an ecosystem function framework to perceptions of community woodlands
Impacts of land use change on ecosystem services and implications for human well-being in Spanish drylands
Programme on Ecosystem Change and Society
Trade-offs across Space, Time, and Ecosystem Services
Key features for more successful place-based sustainability research on social-ecological systems
Participatory scenario planning in place-based social-ecological research
Changes in biodiversity and trade-offs among ecosystem services, stakeholders, and components of well-being
Using visual stimuli to explore the social perceptions of ecosystem services in cultural landscapes
Trade-Offs in Values Assigned to Ecological Goods and Services Associated with Different Coral Reef Management Strategies
| Unique citing works | 49 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 7 |
| Citation span | 2019 - 2026 (8) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 43 |