Coproductive capacities
Rethinking Science-Governance Relations in a Diverse World
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 4240571 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Lorrae Van Kerkhoff (0000-0003-0247-1511, Australian National University), Lorrae E Van Kerkhoff, Louis Lebel (0000-0001-6187-6418, Chiang Mai University) |
| Year | 2015 |
| Volume | 20 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | art14 |
| Publication date | 2015-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Conservation Ecology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1195-5449 • E-ISSN: 1708-3087 |
| Publisher | Resilience Alliance (PUBLISHER • CA) |
| DOI | 10.5751/es-07188-200114 |
| OpenAlex | W2067463035 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 90 |
| References cited | 17 |
Tackling major environmental change issues requires effective partnerships between science and governance, but relatively little work in this area has examined the diversity of settings from which such partnerships may, or may not, emerge. In this special feature we draw on experiences from around the world to demonstrate and investigate the consequences of diverse capacities and capabilities in bringing science and governance together. We propose the concept of coproductive capacities as a useful new lens through which to examine these relations. Coproductive capacity is "the combination of scientific resources and governance capability that shapes the extent to which a society, at various levels, can operationalize relationships between scientific and public, private, and civil society institutions and actors to effect scientifically-informed social change." This recasts the relationships between science and society from notions of "gaps" to notions of interconnectedness and interplay (coproduction); alongside the societal foundations that shape what is or is not possible in that dynamic connection (capacities). The articles in this special feature apply this concept to reveal social, political, and institutional conditions that both support and inhibit high-quality environmental governance as global issues are tackled in particular places. Across these articles we suggest that five themes emerge as important to understanding coproductive capacity: history, experience, and perceptions; quality of relationships (especially in suboptimal settings); disjunct across scales; power, interests, and legitimacy; and alternative pathways for environmental governance. Taking a coproductive capacities perspective can help us identify which interventions may best enable scientifically informed, but locally sensitive approaches to environmental governance
Business · Civil society · Coproduction · Corporate governance · Environmental ethics · Environmental governance · Epistemology · Legitimacy · Operationalization · Political science · Politics · Public relations · Sociology · Climate Change and Geoengineering · Climate Change and Health Impacts · Climate Change Communication and Perception · Law
Quantifying unintended effects of an agroecological research project on farmers' practices and social network in Papua New Guinea
Monitorización de prácticas de disenso y coproducción de conocimiento
Knowledge governance for the Anthropocene
Co-creative technical assistance
A research protocol for studying participatory processes in the use of evidence in child welfare systems
EvolvINC
Assessments of ecosystem services and human well-being in Thailand build and create demand for coproductive capacity
Applications of resilience theory in management of a moose-hunter system in Alaska
Coping with conflicts in the co-production of solid waste management services
The relevance of a coproductive capacity framework to climate change adaptation
Longitudinal assessment of an integrated approach to large-scale common-pool water resource management
Seeking our shared wisdom
What happens at the gap between knowledge and practice? Spaces of encounter and misencounter between environmental scientists and local people
Territorialising knowledge-policy interfaces
Emergence of new knowledge for climate change adaptation
Understanding the science-policy interface in urban climate governance from a co-production perspective
Science for change
Co-productive governance
Gobernanza adaptativa en construcción
Moving Beyond Co-Construction of Knowledge to Enable Self-Determination
Governança e prioridades da ciência brasileira
The Science–Policy Relationship Hierarchy (SPRHi) model of co-production
Crafting usable knowledge for sustainable development
Co-Producing Sustainability
Sustainability Science
From science to action
The art of co-production of knowledge in environmental sciences and management
Improving knowledge exchange among scientists and decision-makers to facilitate the adaptive governance of marine resources
Fostering urban transformations in Latin America
Developing Evaluation Indicators to Improve the Process of Coproducing Usable Climate Science
Co-producing the science–policy interface
Co-Production for Equitable Governance in Community Climate Adaptation
Co-creating climate knowledge
Remaking ocean governance in Aotearoa New Zealand through boundary-crossing narratives about ecosystem-based management
How scientific research incorporates policy
Progressing Green Infrastructure planning
David vs. Goliath? Leveraging citizen science in Israel’s energy debates
Tchange
The politics of adaptive climate management
Connectivity conservation
Is this what success looks like? Mismatches between the aims, claims, and evidence used to demonstrate impact from knowledge exchange processes at the interface of environmental science and policy
Experimental co-production of knowledge to adapt to environmental change in northern India
Diversifying knowledge governance for climate adaptation in protected areas in Colombia
Productive science–policy interactions for sustainable coastal management
Large-scale sustainability programming is reshaping research excellence
Weaving threads of knowledge
Expanding theories of learning for adaptive governance
Embedding co-production of nature-based solutions in urban governance
New science for global sustainability? The institutionalisation of knowledge co-production in Future Earth
An integrative research framework for enabling transformative adaptation
Applying knowledge governance to understand the role of science in environmental regulation
Matching institutionalized expertise with global needs
Co-production in global sustainability
Appraising science-policy interfaces in local climate change policymaking
Maximising the benefits of participatory climate adaptation research by understanding and managing the associated challenges and risks
Navigating collaborative networks and cumulative effects for Sustainable Seas
Co-production of urban forests as nature-based solutions
Moving beyond engineering supremacy
Is it only about science and policy? The ‘intergovernmental epistemologies’ of global environmental governance
Just another buzzword? A systematic literature review of knowledge-related concepts in sustainability science
Co-productive agility and four collaborative pathways to sustainability transformations
Preparing for the health impacts of climate change in Indigenous communities
Plastic Drawdown
Rescaling Knowledge and Governance and Enrolling the Future in New Zealand
Coproductive Capacities Support Implementation of Ecuador’s Sangay-Podocarpus Connectivity Corridor
Reindeer Herders Without Reindeer. The Challenges of Joint Knowledge Production on Kolguev Island in the Russian Arctic
Transdisciplinary agricultural research in Lao PDR
Systemic structures and gaps in social science research communication
Actions speak louder than words
Pandemic pivots
Practical wisdom and virtue ethics for knowledge co-production in sustainability science
Six modes of co-production for sustainability
Entanglements of knowledge and action in sustainability science
A critical political ecology of human dimensions of climate change
Linking Arctic system science research to decision maker needs
Values in transformational sustainability science
Learning from knowledge co-production research and practice in the twenty-first century
Centring Indigenous peoples in knowledge exchange research-practice by resetting assumptions, relationships and institutions
Towards advancing theorization of knowledge exchange processes
On the other end of research
Critical change agent characteristics and competencies for ensuring systemic climate adaptation interventions
Anticipating and transforming futures
Introducing a practice perspective on monitoring for adaptive management
Micronutrient levels of global tropical reef fish communities differ from fisheries capture
Leveraging Nature‐based Solutions for transformation
Climate action from a gender perspective
Co-production of urban climate planning
Beyond “linking knowledge and action”
A question of dissemination
The transformative capacity of public sector organisations in sustainability transitions
Linking Knowledge and Action for Sustainable Development
Knowledge systems for sustainable development
Actionable Knowledge for Environmental Decision Making
States of Knowledge
Capacity building to support knowledge systems for resilient development — approaches, actions, and needs
Opening up knowledge systems for better responses to global environmental change
Transboundary adaptive management to reduce climate-change vulnerability in the western U.S.–Mexico border region
Problems with making and governing global kinds of knowledge☆
The co-production of science and policy in integrated climate assessments
Breaking the Waves in Science Studies
Seeking our shared wisdom
Connecting knowledge with action through coproductive capacities
Building skills for sustainability
Assessments of ecosystem services and human well-being in Thailand build and create demand for coproductive capacity
The relevance of a coproductive capacity framework to climate change adaptation
Capacity building
A New Climate for Society
| Unique citing works | 90 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 7,5 |
| Citation span | 2014 - 2026 (13) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 68 |