Divided Against Itself
South Africa's White Polity
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 4251306 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Peter B Orlik (autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 1970 |
| Volumen | 8 |
| Número | 2 |
| Páginas | 199-212 |
| Fecha de publicación | 1970-07-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | The Journal of Modern African Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0022-278X • E-ISSN: 1469-7777 |
| Editorial | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0022278x00019625 |
| OpenAlex | W1985133829 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 1 |
| Referencias citadas | 2 |
What many prominent Afrikaners heralded as a new era of independence began on 6 October 1960, when a referendum was held to determine whether or not the populace wished South Africa to become a republic. As in virtually all other aspects of national political action, only Whites could voice their opinion via the ballot. Supported by the largely Afrikaner Nationalist Party and opposed by the predominantly English-stock United Party, the referendum, passed by approximately 850,000 to 776,000 votes, probably constituted one of the best indices of the relative strength of Afrikaner and non-Afrikaner elements among South Africa's ruling White polity.1 This dichotomy within the White elite and the friction which still sustains it have their roots in the late nineteenth century, when the Briton vanquished the Boer. Now, the situation has largely reversed itself while the animosities remain
Ballot · Economic history · Elite · Independence (probability theory) · Nationalism · Nationalist Movement · Political action · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Polity · Referendum · Sociology · Voting · White (mutation) · History · Law · South African History and Culture
| Obras citantes distintas | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 0,02 |
| Intervalo de citas | 1972 - 1972 (1) |
| Velocidad de citación | historical |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 1 |