Rejoinder to Stephen Ellis
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 4251817 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Thandika Mkandawire (autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 2003 |
| Volumen | 41 |
| Número | 3 |
| Páginas | 477-483 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2003-09-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | The Journal of Modern African Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0022-278X • E-ISSN: 1469-7777 |
| Editorial | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0022278x03004336 |
| OpenAlex | W2133825812 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 3 |
| Referencias citadas | 1 |
Stephen Ellis's response can be divided into two parts. One concerns my interpretation of the violence of rebel movements in Africa; the other relates to my misunderstanding of his position. With respect to the former, Ellis raises four objections. I will start with these
Epistemology · Interpretation (philosophy) · Linguistics · Psychoanalysis · Global Peace and Security Dynamics · History · Philosophy · Political Conflict and Governance · Psychology · Religion, Society, and Development
| Obras citantes distintas | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 0,14 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2005 - 2021 (17) |
| Velocidad de citación | historical |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 1 |