Socraticcaesuraand the theory-practice relationship
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 4254166 |
|---|---|
| Authors | William F Pinar (0000-0003-0709-4495, University of Rochester), Madeleine R Grumet (Hobart and William Smith Colleges) |
| Year | 1982 |
| Volume | 21 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 50-54 |
| Publication date | 1982-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Theory Into Practice (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0040-5841 • E-ISSN: 1527-2532 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/00405848209542981 |
| OpenAlex | W2058206881 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 8 |
| References cited | 2 |
We wish to suggest that the prevailing relationship between theory and practice is an alienated one. We will sketch the three historical moments in the history of theory and practice, and point to a reconceptualization of the relationship which might create a vital tension between the two, invigorating both. The prevailing view is that theory exists to be translated into practice. It is a view sufficiently common in our time as to seem inevitable, as somehow natural. Graduate students in curriculum often look to curriculum theorists to provide such guidance. School officials have tended to stop looking to us for guidance, many dismiss us with the cynical disenchantment of a disappointed lover. The view of the practitioner is often anti-theoretical: If I can't use it, it's worthless. In hard times like the present ones, curriculum theory can seem an ornament, nice to have around if you can afford it but hardly necessary. We suggest that this divorce, which appears to become less amicable each year, between theorist and practitioner, theory and practice, is due to a misunderstanding for which neither of us is responsible. It is a misunderstanding that probably was bound to occur given the origin of the curriculum field, and the taken-for-granted ideas of the theory-practice relationship which exist, not only in our field, but in nearly every academic field in the contemporary period. It almost goes without saying that in a paper of this length we cannot portray the origin of the cur
Epistemology · Mathematics education · Pedagogy · Sociology · Socratic method · Education and Critical Thinking Development · Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy · Philosophy · Psychology · Reflective Practices in Education
A Reconceptualization of Teacher Education
Re-embodying (preservice middle years) teachers? An attempt to reposition the body and its presence in teaching and learning
Reframing teacher education and teaching
Currículo
Extracting Sun-Beams out of Cucumbers
Dreamt into existence by others
Generations
Subject to change without notice
| Unique citing works | 8 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,18 |
| Citation span | 1982 - 2010 (29) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 8 |