Wittgenstein, Leavis, and Literature
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 4271108 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Cyril Barrett (corresponding author) |
| Year | 1988 |
| Volume | 19 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 385 |
| Publication date | 1988-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | New Literary History (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0028-6087 • E-ISSN: 1080-661X |
| Publisher | JSTOR (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.2307/469344 |
| OpenAlex | W2333460474 |
| Language | EN |
WHEN PREPARING Lectures and Conversations on Aesthetics, Psychology and Religious Belief1 I wrote, in all innocence, to Professor F. R. Leavis asking him if, as he had been a friend of Wittgenstein's, he could tell me about Wittgenstein's understanding of literature, his judgment of Wittgenstein's literary merits, and so forth. I got a courteous reply, but the usual answer: Leavis did not interfere in philosophy so why should presume to interfere in literary criticism? Leavis's eccentricity was notorious, but not having met him, I thought this was rather severe, if not downright silly. Having now read his Memories of Wittgenstein I can understand his reply better.2 Perhaps this is a good point at which to start: a direct connection with the most unfavorable judgment on and literature
Art · Philosophy · Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |