Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Power Relations in the Traditional Knowledge Debate

A Critical Analysis of Forums

Bibliographic Data

ID4282587
AuthorsCharles Kamau Maina, Charles Maina (Western University, corresponding author)
Year2011
Volume18
Issue2
Pages143-178
Publication date2011-05-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueInternational Journal of Cultural Property (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0940-7391 • E-ISSN: 1465-7317
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/s0940739111000130
OpenAlexW2040378658
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited21

An ongoing debate on the protection of traditional knowledge was prompted by the United Nations General Assembly declaration of the International Decade of the World's Indigenous Peoples in 1995 and the declaration of the Second International Decade in 2004. These two declarations challenged governments and the international community to address, nationally and internationally, issues that affect indigenous communities. One such issue is the protection of traditional knowledge. The three key international multilateral forums that are debating traditional knowledge issues are the World Intellectual Property Organization, the World Trade Organization, and the Convention on Biological Diversity. Using a political economy framework, this study analyzes the policymaking processes and mandates of the three multilateral forums in order to highlight stakeholders' levels of involvement in these processes. The study found that the multilateral forums' power structures, mandates, and decision-making processes disadvantage indigenous peoples and hinder their full participation in the forums' processes. The study recommends establishing a forum that would take into account indigenous peoples' worldviews; otherwise policy outcomes from these discussions will probably disadvantage indigenous peoples

Convention · Convention on Biological Diversity · Declaration · Disadvantage · Economic growth · Indigenous · Intellectual property · Political science · Politics · Power (physics · Public relations · Traditional knowledge · Economic Growth and Development · Intellectual Property and Patents · International Development and Aid · Law · Public Administration

  • Indigenous Peoples and the International Legal System

    Open Access•Claudia Masoni•Fourth World Journal•2019

  • Project Narratives

    Open Access•Krystyna Cieślik, Art Dewulf et al.•Development and Change•2020

  • The political economy of communication

    Vincent Mosco•The political economy of…•1996

  • The Global Political Economy

    Stephen Gill•The global political economy•1988

  • Shamans, Software, and Spleens

    Open Access•James Boyle•Shamans, Software, and Spleens•1996

  • Information Feudalism

    Peter Drahos, John Braithwaite•Information Feudalism•2017

  • Polishing the Kaswentha’

    Open Access•James W Ransom, Kreg Ettenger et al.•Environmental Science & Policy•2001

  • Integrating science and local knowledge in environmental risk management

    Open Access•L Failing, Rabia Gregory et al.•Ecological Economics•2007

  • Resource Mismanagement Versus Sustainable Livelihoods

    Lenard Milich•Society & Natural Resources•1999

  • Representing Traditional Knowledge

    Anne Kendrick, Micheline Manseau•Society & Natural Resources•2008

  • The role of intellectual property rights in economic growth

    Open Access•David M Gould, William C Gruben•Journal of Development Economics•1996

  • Indigenous Knowledge of Ecological Variability and Commons Management

    Open Access•Teetl’it Gwich’in Renewable Resources Council, F Berkes et al.•Human Ecology•2006

  • Approaches to Social Research

    Bruce C Straits, Royce A Singleton et al.•Instructor's Manual to Accompany…•1998

  • Convention on the Protection and Promotion of the Diversity of Cultural Expressions (2005)

    Open Access•Antonios Vlassis, Lilian Richieri Hanania•Diogenes•2008

  • Decisions and Nondecisions

    Open Access•Peter Bachrach, Morton S Baratz•American Political Science Review•1963

  • American Folklore Society Recommendations to the Wipo Intergovernmental Committee on Intellectual Property and Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge, and Folklore

    American Folklore Society•Journal of American Folklore•2004

Unique citing works2
Citations per year0,29
Citation span2019 - 2020 (2)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 2

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae