The native American graves protection and repatriation act in its first decade
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 4282813 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Jar Nafziger (College of Law), Rj Dobkins (Willamette University) |
| Year | 1999 |
| Volume | 8 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 77-107 |
| Publication date | 1999-01-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | International Journal of Cultural Property (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0940-7391 • E-ISSN: 1465-7317 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0940739199770621 |
| OpenAlex | W2008967237 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 6 |
The global effort to protect indigenous heritage relies on national legislation. The Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA) of the United States provides one model for accomplishing a broad agenda of protective measures. NAGPRA confirms indigenous ownership of cultural items excavated or discovered on federal and tribal lands, criminalizes trafficking in indigenous human remains and cultural items, and establishes a process of repatriation of material to native groups. In implementing the law, questions related to cultural affiliation, culturally unidentifiable material, the status of native groups not recognized by the federal government, and the scope of a group's cultural patrimony have been particularly troublesome. A case study of the repatriation process highlights issues in implementing NAGPRA and benefits in fostering consultation and collaboration among native groups, museums, and federal agencies. Finally, the article considers the controversies that have come before a statutory review committee and the federal courts during NAGPRA's first decade. This experience demonstrates the limitations of formal dispute resolution as a means of developing and implementing the law
Cultural heritage · Cultural property · Ethnology · Federal law · Government (linguistics · Indigenous · Legislation · Native american · Political science · Repatriation · Sociology · Statutory law · Archaeological Research and Protection · Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation · Law · Public Administration
| Citations per year | 0.29 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2005 - 2022 (18) |
| Highly cited | No |