Putting into Place Solutions for Nazi Era Dispossessions of Cultural Objects
The UK Experience
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 4282888 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Charlotte Woodhead (0000-0002-5545-6238, University of Warwick, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2016 |
| Volume | 23 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 385-406 |
| Publication date | 2016-11-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | International Journal of Cultural Property (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0940-7391 • E-ISSN: 1465-7317 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0940739116000278 |
| OpenAlex | W2520203121 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 4 |
| References cited | 3 |
Since 2000, the United Kingdom's Spoliation Advisory Panel has provided an alternative dispute resolution mechanism for resolving disputes surrounding Nazi era dispossessions of cultural objects. This article analyzes the way in which the panel has reached its recommendations and how they have been implemented. While the panel's recommendations provide a means of resolving disputes in circumstances where litigation might fail a claimant, claimants may encounter difficulties should an institution fail to implement the recommended remedy because of the extra-judicial nature of the recommendations. This article therefore analyzes the effectiveness of the panel's work in overcoming some of the shortcomings of litigation and the way in which the parties have put into effect the panel's recommendations. Furthermore, suggestions are made for ways in which to ensure compliance with the recommendations even in the absence of judicial enforcement
Business · Compliance (psychology · Dispute resolution · Enforcement · Institution · Law and economics · Nazism · Panel discussion · Plaintiff · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Work (physics · Archaeological Research and Protection · Engineering · Law · Law in Society and Culture · Legal principles and applications · Psychology · Social Psychology
Balancing the Ledger
The Conflation of Morality and "the Fair and Just Solution" in the Determination of Restitution Claims Involving Nazi-Looted Art
From "Leader to Pariah"? On the Dutch Restitutions Committee and the inclusion of the public interest in assessing Nazi-spoliated art claims
Restitution Policies on Nazi-Looted Art in the Netherlands and the United Kingdom
| Unique citing works | 4 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,5 |
| Citation span | 2018 - 2026 (9) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 4 |