Restitution of Archaeological Artifacts
The Arab-Israeli Aspects
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 4282957 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Talia Einhorn (corresponding author) |
| Year | 1996 |
| Volume | 5 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 133-153 |
| Publication date | 1996-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | International Journal of Cultural Property (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0940-7391 • E-ISSN: 1465-7317 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0940739196000252 |
| OpenAlex | W3126013558 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 9 |
Since the second half of the last century, public international law has been developing rules regulating the restitution of cultural objects removed from occupied territories during armed conflict. Today it is generally recognized that customary international law forbids pillage. The Protocol to the 1954 Hague Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict further mandates that artifacts removed from an occupied territory must be returned to the competent authorities of that territory at the close of hostilities. The Arab-Israeli case highlights the problematic side of this solution. Following the Six Day War in 1967, the Sinai Peninsula, the Golan Heights, the Gaza strip and the territory known as the "West Bank" came under Israeli control. Israeli archaeologists carried out numerous excavations, and discovered artifacts of special importance to Jewish cultural heritage. It is regrettable that, as a result of the peace treaty with Egypt, these artifacts can no longer be exhibited and appreciated at the Israel Museum in Jerusalem, but had to be delivered to Egypt, where they now face an uncertain future. A similar fate may befall the artifacts excavated in the Golan Heights. The Palestinian claim for restitution cannot be based on the Protocol. The Problem is nevertheless the same in all cases; if the artifacts are to be preserved, properly appreciated and made available for purposes of study and research, it may be more appropriate to distribute them among the states by way of compromise and agreement, that will seek to enhance their cultural significance, rather than use the arbitrary sole criterion of the place of discovery
Archaeology · Compromise · Convention · Cultural heritage · Cultural property · Geography · Peninsula · Political science · Restitution · Treaty · Archaeological Research and Protection · History · International Law and Human Rights · Law · Middle East and Rwanda Conflicts
The Missing Reversioner
Two Ways of Thinking about Cultural Property
State Succession in Municipal Law and International Law Vol. I
The Unidroit Draft Convention on the International Protection of Cultural Property
Some Recent Practical Experience in the Implementation of the 1954 Hague Convention
The Nation and the Object
| Unique citing works | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,25 |
| Citation span | 2022 - 2022 (1) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 1 |