Global Cultural Law and Policy in the Age of Ubiquitous Internet
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 4282959 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Mira Burri (0000-0001-9224-3568, University of Lucerne, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2014 |
| Volume | 21 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 349-364 |
| Publication date | 2014-08-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | International Journal of Cultural Property (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0940-7391 • E-ISSN: 1465-7317 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0940739114000137 |
| OpenAlex | W2146601729 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 25 |
Digital technologies and the Internet in particular have transformed the ways we create, distribute, use, reuse, and consume cultural content; have impacted the workings of the cultural industries, and more generally the processes of making, experiencing, and remembering culture in local and global spaces. Yet, few of these, often profound, transformations have found reflection in law and institutional design. Cultural policy toolkits, in particular at the international level, are still very much offline and analog and conceive of culture as static property linked to national sovereignty and state boundaries. The article describes this state of affairs and asks the key question of whether there is a need to reform global cultural law and policy and if yes, what the essential elements of such a reform should be. The article is informed by the ongoing and vibrant digital copyright and creativity discourse1but seeks to address also the less discussed, non-intellectual property tools of the cultural policy package. It thematizes the complexity and the interconnectedness of different fields of policymaking, as various decisions critical to cultural processes are made by institutions without cultural mandate. While this problem is not entirely new and is naturally triggered by the intrinsic duality of cultural goods and services, the article argues that the digital networked environment has only accentuated complexity, spillover effects, and unintended consequences. The question is how to navigate this newly created and profoundly fluid space, so as to ensure the preservation and sustainable provision of culture. The article hopes to contribute to the process of finding answers to this taxing question by identifying a few essential elements that need to be taken into consideration when designing future-oriented cultural policy
Cultural policy · Law and economics · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Sovereignty · State (computer science · The Internet · World Wide Web · Computer Science · Copyright and Intellectual Property · Cultural Industries and Urban Development · Law
The Myth of Digital Democracy
The Googlization of Everything
Trade liberalization and cultural policy
Cosmopolitan Communications
Creative Destruction
Culture or Commerce? A Comparative Assessment of International Interactions and Developing Countries at Unesco, WTO, and Beyond
Cultural Dissent
Digital Na(t)ives? Variation in Internet Skills and Uses among Members of the “Net Generation”
Two Ways of Thinking about Cultural Property
Form and Substance in International Agreements
International Law
Digital Technologies and Traditional Cultural Expressions
The Nation and the Object
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,33 |
| Citation span | 2020 - 2024 (5) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |