Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Political Science and Presidential Nominations

Bibliographic Data

ID4286783
AuthorsLeon D Epstein (corresponding author)
Year1978
Volume93
Issue2
Pages177-195
Publication date1978-06-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePolitical Science Quarterly (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0032-3195 • E-ISSN: 1538-165X
PublisherOxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.2307/2148605
OpenAlexW2318562968
LanguageEN
Citations received4

Two concerns prompt this study. The first, plainer and more specific, is to use post-1976 hindsight to appraise selected generalizations that political scientists made about presidential nominations before the nominations of 1976. The second concern flows largely from the extent to which the generalizations are found to hold for the nominations of 1976 and for those that might be thought to follow. Does the appraisal lead to a favorable view of the of a discipline that seeks to describe and explain politics in the present tense, now and for at least a near future? Or does it suggest that we should limit ourselves to the reconstruction of what happened, and why it happened, in the historical past7 The second question arises in less than ideal conditions for scientific endeavor. Students of politics can make a stronger argument for the science of their work when they deal with quantitatively more tractable subject matter. Generalizations about presidential nominations are based on small numbers-only two major party choices every four years-a mere twenty nominations in four decades of contemporary politics. Even that span may be too long given recent substantial changes in the rules for delegate selection and for campaign finance. Moreover, most of the generalizations about presidential nominations that command attention, here and elsewhere, are probabilistic, predictive statements that are often untestable in any rigorous sense. Rather than stating only the relations between variables, they also try to forecast what will happen as a result of such relations. It should be plain that I do not intend to belabor my political science colleagues for any mistaken expectations about the 1976 nominations. I had

Political economy · Political science · Politics · Presidential system · Sociology · Law · Political Science Research and Education · Public Administration

  • Two Parties, Two Types of Nominees, Two Paths to Winning a Presidential Nomination, 1972‐2004

    Open Access•D Jason Berggren•Presidential Studies Quarterly•2007

  • The (Un)predictability of Primaries with Many Candidates

    Open Access•Alexandra Cooper, Michael C Munger•Public Choice•2000

  • What Happened to the British Party Model

    Open Access•Leon D Epstein•American Political Science Review•1980

  • The Carryover Effect in Presidential Elections

    Open Access•Walter J Stone•American Political Science Review•1986

Unique citing works4
Citations per year0,09
Citation span1980 - 2007 (28)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 4

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae