Why Journalism Still Matters

Bibliographic Data

ID4288770
AuthorsBenjamin Toff (0000-0001-7201-4389, University of Minnesota, corresponding author)
Year2019
Volume134
Issue3
Pages542-543
Publication date2019-09-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePolitical Science Quarterly (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0032-3195 • E-ISSN: 1538-165X
PublisherOxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1002/polq.12953
OpenAlexW2972630089
LanguageEN
Citations received43

Advances in communication technology have coincided with many changes in contemporary journalism. News now travels from servers to smartphones in seconds. Reporters have unprecedented access to public records, databases of filings, and tools for connecting with a wider range of sources than ever before. Technology has also wreaked havoc on the business models of many media organizations. Still, despite these many changes, the practice of journalism has not been fundamentally redefined; it remains as vital and vibrant as any time in recent memory, as Michael Schudson argues in his thought-provoking new book Why Journalism Still Matters. Schudson is specifically concerned with a distinct form of professional journalism. With reverence and even sentimentality, Schudson offers an ideal-typical model of journalists as public servants who strive to “step outside a personal or political standpoint and into a professional mission” (p. 14)—a mission that involves adherence to norms of independence, accuracy, accountability, and the rule of law. In short, even as the line between reporting and marketing has blurred, professional journalism is still essentially aimed at safeguarding liberal democracy

Accountability · Commercialism · Democracy · Independence (probability theory · Journalism · Media studies · Political science · Politics · Public relations · Safeguarding · Sociology · Technical Journalism · Law · Media Studies and Communication

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub