The Failure of Liberal Homeless Policy in the Koch and Dinkins Administration
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 4290179 |
|---|---|
| Authors | J Phillip Thompson (0000-0002-7712-6483, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1996 |
| Volume | 111 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 639-660 |
| Publication date | 1996-12-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Political Science Quarterly (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0032-3195 • E-ISSN: 1538-165X |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.2307/2152088 |
| OpenAlex | W2314888023 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
Social welfare policy has been critiqued from three distinct-though not mutually exclusive-perspectives. One critique, most prominently argued by Theodore Lowi, maintains that the major flaw in social welfare programs is that they are produced (or expanded) undemocratically-through the courts and by bureaucratic discretion. I Without increased public support for the welfare state, Lowi predicts that the liberal welfare state will destroy itself. If liberal state is to survive, he states, it cannot do so without clear, highly stabilized, and self-restrictive set benefit categories, whether these are generous or severe.2 Lowi's concern is with the political stability the liberal state, not the specific content welfare programs. His argument is that the citizen public should explicitly approve the level welfare expenditures, or trouble will result. A second critique, argued by Charles Anderson, is that government policies are often arbitrary, unfair, and irrational.3 Anderson maintains that social and economic systems are often too complex for sensible regulation through market systems with constitutionally protected individual rights. Anderson posits that the government should serve as inquiry, type think-tank, recruiting citizen-experts to organize rigorous review government policies and to develop pragmatic approaches regularly adjustedserving the public interest. Citizen participation in community inquiry of one's vocation is to Anderson, a fundamental act citizenship as important, surely, as voting or partisan affiliation.4 Anderson acknowledges that vocations have hierarchies not ame
Administration (probate law) · Political science · American Constitutional Law and Politics · Law · Legal and Constitutional Studies · Legal Systems and Judicial Processes · Public Administration
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,1 |
| Citation span | 2005 - 2006 (2) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |