Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The De-Institutionalization of Congress

Bibliographic Data

ID4293699
AuthorsAnthony J Chergosky (American Red Cross), Jason M Roberts (0000-0001-8113-1827, United States Congress)
Year2018
Volume133
Issue3
Pages475-495
Publication date2018-09-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePolitical Science Quarterly (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0032-3195 • E-ISSN: 1538-165X
PublisherOxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1002/polq.12800
OpenAlexW2890178555
LanguageEN
Citations received5

THE FRAMERS OF THE U.S. CONSTITUTION designed the Congress as the most powerful branch of the new government. The institution was granted wide authority over crucial governmental functions such as taxing, spending, and war making. The Framers did not design the institution to be efficient, however. The two chambers were given differing electoral rules, and they diverge starkly in how seats are allocated to the several states.1 To make use of its great powers, Congress must find concurrent agreement across the two chambers and gain the assent of a president who is chosen independently of the legislature. This makes lawmaking an inherently adversarial process. As a result, Congress has been beset by conflict and periods of gridlock throughout its history. One consequence of this is that Congress has consistently been the least popular branch of the U.S. government.2 Citizens are turned off by much of what Congress does, including passing laws, failing to pass laws, and the conflictual process that is a natural consequence of investing power in a large body responsible for representing diverse interests.3

Adversarial system · Constitution · Government (linguistics) · Gridlock · Institution · Institutionalisation · Law and economics · Lawmaking · Legislature · Political science · Politics · Power (physics) · Separation of powers · Sociology · American Constitutional Law and Politics · Law · Public Administration

  • Bipartisanship and US Foreign Policy

    Jordan Tama•Bipartisanship and US Foreign…•2023

  • Organizing Staff in the U.S. Senate

    Nicholas O Howard, Mark Owens•Congress & the Presidency•2021

  • Mechanisms of Checks and Balances

    Open Access•J Cha, Jon C Rogowski et al.•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2025

  • Rules and the Containment of Conflict in Congress

    Open Access•Celeste Fong, Christian Fong•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2022

  • Interpersonal Relationships, Bipartisanship, and January 6th

    Open Access•James M Curry, Jason M Roberts•American Political Science Review•2025

Citations per year1
Citation span2021 - 2025 (5)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae