Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Rehabilitation Through Work? Disability and the Productivist Road to Participation in the East of Germany1

Bibliographic Data

ID4301461
AuthorsDirk Bunzel
Year2007
Volume20
Issue3
Pages362-383
Publication date2007-09-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Historical Sociology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0952-1909 • E-ISSN: 1467-6443
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/j.1467-6443.2007.00308.x
OpenAlexW2045690669
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited3

Drawing on secondary data and interviews, this paper traces the economic and socio-cultural roots of contemporary policies to promote full participation of people with disabilities in mainstream German society. Underlying such policies and related practices has been a concept of rehabilitation through work that evolved within a context of labour shortages, Protestant work ethics, and German welfarism at the beginning of the 20th century and that has yielded rather ambiguous consequences. I argue this elective affinity among economic, cultural, and socio-political imperatives has undermined potentials for integration and self-actualization of people with disabilities. Not only was rehabilitation subordinated to a productivist logic and provoked forms of ill-paid or even forced labour; rehabilitation policies and measures have also been part of a system of social governance that effectively helped to segregate the "able" from the "unable" and that promulgated an ethos of productivism. Significantly, this essentially utilitarian ethos - which rendered health and rehabilitation into a social obligation and valued each wo/man according to his/her fitness and motivation to contribute to socio-economic development - evolved within capitalism but was equally pronounced in East Germany under state-socialist rule. Contrary to the egalitarian principles of both "socialist humanism" and "Western enlightenment", policies and practices trans-societally focussed on the promotion of those who could - potentially at least - contribute to the regime of industrial production. As the example of East Germany demonstrates, social participation through paid work remains incomplete, at best, and provokes further segregation - even in times of severe labour shortages. The paper concludes that notwithstanding contemporary rhetoric, rehabilitation through work has remained a central pillar of contemporary welfare policies. In times of unbroken structural unemployment, the productivist paradigm and ensuing policies have become increasingly problematic - not only for the inclusion of people with disabilities. Experiences with the productivist modes of participation and with rehabilitation in East Germany suggest a post-productivist paradigm of inclusion that seeks participation beyond paid work

Capitalism · Ethos · German · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Discrimination and Equality Law · Healthcare innovation and challenges · Social Policy and Reform Studies · Law

  • Kwame Nkrumah, Disability, and Rehabilitation in Ghana, 1957–66

    Open Access•Jeff Grischow, Jeff D Grischow•The Journal of African History•2011

  • Social Change and Modernization

    Bruno Grancelli•Social Change and Modernization•1995

  • Imitation and Innovation

    D Eleanor Westney•Imitation and Innovation•1987

  • A working social model? Disability, work and disability politics in the 21st century

    Open Access•Colin Barnes•Critical Social Policy•2000

Unique citing works1
Citations per year0,07
Citation span2011 - 2011 (1)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 1

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae