Des valeurs et des pratiques de l'architecture contemporaine
Trois tentatives d'explication de la « monumentalisation » des constructions publiques
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 4303086 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Florent Champy (Laboratoire Interdisciplinaire Solidarités Sociétés Territoires, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2003 |
| Volume | 145 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 9-28 |
| Publication date | 2003-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | L Homme et la société (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0018-4306 • E-ISSN: 2101-0226 |
| Publisher | CAIRN (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.3917/lhs.145.0009 |
| OpenAlex | W1511488070 |
| Language | FR |
| References cited | 2 |
Values and Practices of Contemporary ArchitectureMore and more “ordinary” buildings—those that are without any direct relation to centers of authority—are conceived initially as liable to become tomorrow’s heritage. This intention is paradoxical because the status of monuments in general presupposes either a power relationship or the passage of time which confers memorial value. Possible explanations include, on the one hand, the changes relative to the division of labor necessary to architectural conception for public works and, on the other hand, the ambitions of some architects in a context of increased individualism within the profession. These explanations are more complementary than conflictual
Context (archaeology) · Individualism · Political science · Power (physics) · Relation (database) · Sociology · Value (mathematics) · Architecture · French Urban and Social Studies · History · Law
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |