Which Ultimate(s) Would Theology without Walls Be About
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 4305673 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Jeanine Diller (corresponding author) |
| Year | 2016 |
| Volume | 51 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 499-505 |
| Publication date | 2016-01-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of ecumenical studies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0022-0558 • E-ISSN: 2162-3937 |
| Publisher | Project MUSE (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1353/ecu.2016.0045 |
| OpenAlex | W2588768856 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 3 |
Is there a possible shared intentional object or objects across the religions about which you could construct a theology without walls? I suggest five possible answers to this question, from the perspectives of ultimological exclusivists, inclusivists, first-order pluralists, second-order pluralists, and error theorists. I conclude that a theology without walls will need an argument against ultimological exclusivism and error theorism and that it might take different shapes depending on which of the other three perspectives we adopt
Argument (complex analysis) · Biology · Construct (python library) · Economics · Epistemology · Linguistics · Object (grammar) · Order (exchange) · Sociology · Theology · Computer Science · Karl Barth and Christian Theology · Philosophy · Religion and Society Interactions · Theology and Philosophy of Evil
| Citations per year | 0.14 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2019 - 2019 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |