Interstate Relational Ethics

Mengzi and Later Mohists in Dialogue

Bibliographic Data

ID4313700
AuthorsTing-Mien Lee (0000-0003-1591-7682, University of Macau, corresponding author)
Year2023
Volume14
Issue5
Pages659
Publication date2023-05-15
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueReligions (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2077-1444 • E-ISSN: 2077-1444
PublisherMDPI AG (PUBLISHER • IT)
DOI10.3390/rel14050659
OpenAlexW4376644411
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited12

The popular interpretation holds that Mengzi was strongly critical of Mozi because the Mohist moral theory was antithetical to Confucian relational ethics. According to this interpretation, Mohism promotes the norm of "impartiality" or "impartial care", which violates the Confucian norms of "filial piety" and "graded love". Accordingly, Mengzi thought that the Confucian ideal would not be realized if Mohism continued to prevail. Scholars have tried to nuance and revise this dominant interpretation. For example, some have pointed out the importance of family-oriented values in Mohist ethical theory, arguing that Mengzi likely misunderstood or purposefully mispresented Mohism. This article is an initial attempt to modify the popular interpretation by arguing that the debate between Mengzi and Mohist regarding relational ethics is predominantly about the relations between states rather than individuals. This interpretation sheds light on a core difference between Confucian and Mohist ethical theories and can help make better sense of some later Mohist passages

Environmental ethics · Epistemology · Hubris · Linguistics · Mohism · Theology · China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance · Chinese history and philosophy · Indian and Buddhist Studies · Philosophy

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access