Thoughtlessness as an Intellectual Vice in Kierkegaard and Aristotle
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 4314392 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Eleanor Helms (California Polytechnic State University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2023 |
| Volume | 14 |
| Issue | 11 |
| Pages | 1401 |
| Publication date | 2023-11-09 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Religions (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2077-1444 • E-ISSN: 2077-1444 |
| Publisher | MDPI AG (PUBLISHER • IT) |
| DOI | 10.3390/rel14111401 |
| OpenAlex | W4388525436 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 21 |
I examine the Kierkegaardian intellectual vice of thoughtlessness (Tankeløshed) and its opposite, the Aristotelian intellectual virtue of phronēsis, or practical wisdom. I argue that thoughtlessness is primarily an intellectual problem rather than a moral one. My emphasis on intellectual virtue in Kierkegaard contrasts with more typical characterizations of passion, will, and action as Kierkegaard's main concerns and reliance on intellect as an obstacle to be overcome. Drawing on Aristotle's account of phronēsis as the intellectual virtue related to action, I show that Kierkegaard offers a rich account of practical wisdom and a critique of its opposite, thoughtlessness. I conclude that, since there are different kinds of wisdom, Kierkegaard can say that faith is not a form of knowledge in the sense of epistēmē, or scientific knowledge, while preserving a central role for intellect in the task and life of faith
Epistemology · Faith · Intellect · Passion · Virtue · Kierkegaardian Philosophy and Influence · Philosophy · Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism · Psychology · Social Psychology · Theology and Philosophy of Evil
The Engaged Intellect
Heidegger on Aristotelian phronêsis and moral justification
Intuition in Plato and the Platonic tradition
Kierkegaard’s account of thought experiment
Is Kierkegaard an Irrationalist? Reason, Paradox, and Faith
Kierkegaard on the transformative power of art
Knowing in Aristotle part 2
Neither Irrationalist Nor Apologist
| Highly cited | No |
|---|