Corporealism as an Ontological Position and Its Involvement in the Thought of Tertullian
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 4314548 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Marián Ambrozy (0000-0002-0421-436X, International School of Management Slovakia, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2021 |
| Volume | 12 |
| Issue | 7 |
| Pages | 534 |
| Publication date | 2021-07-15 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Religions (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2077-1444 • E-ISSN: 2077-1444 |
| Publisher | MDPI AG (PUBLISHER • IT) |
| DOI | 10.3390/rel12070534 |
| OpenAlex | W3180774525 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 47 |
This paper aims to examine the meaning, role, inspirations, and place of corporealism in Tertullian's system of thought. The extent to which corporealism is a basic philosophical belief in Tertullian's work and to what extent it is a particular element of his theological doctrine is questioned. It presents the named ontological position as a rare specificity within the range of early Christian thought, especially in Tertullian's works De anima and De carne Cristi. This paper makes a clear distinction between corporealism and materialism, as it tries to determine the degree of influence of Stoic philosophy, especially ontology, on Tertullian, as well as the influence of Aristotle in selected areas. In this context, his traducianism is also examined. In the ontological context, the status of the soul and God in Tertullian thought is also presented. In connection with the metaphysical problem of creation, the article also touches on the question of creatio ex nihilo as a problem on which Tertullian had to take a stand. It investigates the role of corporealism in Tertullian's polemic against Marcion, Apelles, and the Valentinian Gnosis by mapping which elements in the teachings of these representatives and Gnosis, especially (but not exclusively) Valentinian, could provoke Tertullian to controversy. This paper holds the opinion that Tertullian's corporealism was due to his theological views and controversy with opponents, which were used as philosophical inspiration, especially stoic inspiration, but was used mainly in the service of his theological thinking and strategic needs for argumentation
Doctrine · Epistemology · Metaphysics · Ontology · Soul · Theology · Byzantine Studies and History · Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies · History · Philosophy · Religious, Philosophical, and Educational Studies
Imitation of »We« Passages in Acts? Canonical Influence and the Internal (First Person) Narrator of the Acts of John
Esoteric Discourse and the Jerusalem Temple in the Gospel of Philip
Tertullian on the Afterlife
Zur Bedeutung der griechischen Philosophie für die christliche Wahrheit und Bildung bei Tertullian und bei Augustin
The chert workshop of Tozal de la Mesa (Alins del Monte, Huesca, Spain) and its exploitation in historical times
How the Body of Lazarus Helps to Solve a Pauline Problem
The Place of the Gospel of Philip in the Context of Early Christian Claims about Jesus' Marital Status
The A-Cosmic Doctrine of Marcion and Paul's Apocalypticism
The Salvation of the Flesh in Tertullian of Carthage
The Egyptian Background of Gnostic Mythology
Impatience and Humanity's Sinful State in Tertullian of Carthage
Tertullian on Heresy, History, and the Reappropriation of Revelation
The Gospel of Philip and Clement of Alexandria
The Gospel of Philip and Clement of Alexandria
The Authentikos Logos
Ex uno homine tota haec animarum redundantia. Ursprung, Entstehung und Weitergabe der individuellen Seele nach Tertullian
Was Marcion a Docetist? The Body of Evidence vs. Tertullian's Argument
Did Tertullian Possess a Greek Copy or Latin Translation of Marcion's Gospel
Christ's Birth of a Virgin Who Became a Wife
The Subtlety of Tertullian
I Believe Because it is Absurd
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |