Meaning and fate of critique in the Ontological Turn
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 4320400 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Daniel Oliveira Pucciarelli (0000-0002-9053-6444, State University of Minas Gerais, Brazil, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2022 |
| Volume | 45 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 95-114 |
| Publication date | 2022-03-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Trans/Form/Ação (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0101-3173 • E-ISSN: 1980-539X |
| Publisher | FapUNIFESP (SciELO) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1590/0101-3173.2022.v45n1.p95 |
| OpenAlex | W4220685068 |
| SCIELO_PID | S0101-31732022000100095 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 4 |
The paper explores the meaning and fate of the category of critique within the so-called "ontological" or "speculative turn". First, the article addresses the question of knowing what could give consistency to the very concept of a contemporary ontological turn, in order to present, in a second moment, the tension that, since Kant, constitutes the relationship between critique and ontology. Finally, the paper explores - particularly in the work of Quentin Meillassoux - the possibility of a new ontology that claims to be both non-dogmatic and immune to the neutralization of ontology carried out by critique
Consistency (knowledge bases) · Epistemology · Fundamental ontology · Meaning (existential) · Ontology · Order (exchange) · Sociology · Artificial Intelligence · Computer Science · Critical Theory and Philosophy · Philosophy · Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism
| Unique citing works | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0.25 |
| Citation span | 2022 - 2022 (1) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 1 |