Policy Innovation or 'Muddling Through'? 'New' Environmental Policy Instruments in the United Kingdom

Bibliographic Data

ID4328476
AuthorsAndrew J Jordan (0000-0001-7678-1024), Andrew Jordan, Rüdiger K W Wurzel (0000-0001-5873-4232), R Zito, Lars Brückner
Year2003
Volume12
Issue1
Pages179-200
Publication date2003-03-01
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueEnvironmental Politics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0964-4016 • E-ISSN: 1743-8934
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/09644010412331308344a
OpenAlexW4255990805
LanguageEN
Citations received7

The UK began to experiment with voluntary agreements and market-based instruments much later than other northern, industrialised member states of the EU. This delayed start can be accounted for by the comparatively low level of environmental awareness in the UK throughout much of the 1980s, and the belief that domestic regulation, when suitably fine-tuned, was more than capable of addressing most domestic environmental problems. The deployment of 'new' environmental policy instruments grew significantly in the 1990s, although the UK still has comparatively few voluntary agreements. The aim of this contribution is to assess how far these tools are genuinely 'new' or not as compared to pre-existing institutional forms and policy instrument types. The findings suggest that the UK's institutional setting has restricted and strongly conditioned the development and functioning of voluntary agreements. Until recently, the same could be said of economic instruments, but the arrival of tradable permits, complex policy packages and various other eco-taxes is indicative of genuine innovation, which breaks decisively with the past

Economics · Environmental policy · Environmental resource management · Kingdom · Political science · Regional science · Sociology · Environmental and Social Impact Assessments · European and International Law Studies · Public Administration · Regulation and Compliance Studies

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub