The Dichotomy Free and Literal Translation
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 4344441 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Katharina Barbe (corresponding author) |
| Year | 2002 |
| Volume | 41 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 328-337 |
| Publication date | 2002-09-30 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Meta Journal des traducteurs (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0026-0452 • E-ISSN: 1492-1421 |
| Publisher | Consortium Erudit (PUBLISHER • CA) |
| DOI | 10.7202/001968ar |
| OpenAlex | W2069742725 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 8 |
Historically, the status of translation and translators has changed with the ascendance of monolingualism. Even today, translation is not fully recognized as an independent field of study, and translators as well as translation theorists are not without blame for this. The requirements for a good translation vary with each text. The concepts of free and literal translation are questionable and need to be rexamined. A cross-cultural study of translation including non-Indo-European languages may help us to break out of this dichotomy, as may the study of oral cultures
Blame · Dynamic and formal equivalence · Field (mathematics) · Linguistics · Literal (mathematical logic) · Literal translation · Machine translation · Pure mathematics · Source text · Translation (biology) · Translation studies · Computer Science · Mathematics · Philosophy · Psychology · Social Psychology · Translation Studies and Practices
FamilyisLove
Linguistic Tension in the Postcolonial Judicial Landscape
Between English Humour and National Stereotypes – Translating Stephen Clarke’s Novel Merde Happens into Italian
The Discourse of Philanthropy in Italy and The United States
The Translation of Judgments
The role of registerial expertise in translators’ logical choices
"Comment on "Chinese values in English translations
Glossing in the Linguistic Survey of India
| Citations per year | 0.4 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2006 - 2026 (21) |
| Highly cited | No |