Two models of infant welfare in the first half of the twentieth century
New Zealand and the USA
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 4347448 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Linda Bryder (0000-0003-1673-4984, University of Auckland, autor correspondente) |
| Ano | 2003 |
| Volume | 12 |
| Fascículo | 4 |
| Páginas | 547-558 |
| Data de publicação | 2003-12-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Não |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Women s History Review (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0961-2025 • E-ISSN: 1747-583X |
| Editora | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/09612020300200734 |
| OpenAlex | W4236654570 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 6 |
| Referências citadas | 4 |
In New Zealand, as elsewhere in the Western world in the early twentieth century, maternal and infant health became a national concern and the task of organising health services was taken up by women in a voluntary capacity. In the USA this culminated in the Sheppard-Towner (Maternity and Infancy) Act of 1921. However, within a decade American paediatricians had assumed control of the services. By contrast, the services in New Zealand remained in the hands of a female-run voluntary organisation, the Plunket Society. From the foundation of the Society in 1907, health services for mothers and their infants became the site of territorial disputes between various health providers – the Health Department, the Plunket Society and paediatricians. This article explores why and how the Plunket Society managed to retain control of this important area of public health in the face of challenges by these other health providers. It will be argued that the reasons relate to the tenacity with which the ‘maternalists’ claimed the territory as their own, their informal access to channels of power, their public support, and their success in maintaining medical respectability through their own honorary and paid professional staff
Economic growth · Economics · Environmental health · Genealogy · Geography · Health services · Political science · Population · Public health · Social science · Social Welfare · Sociology · Voluntary association · Welfare · Child Welfare and Adoption · Historical Psychiatry and Medical Practices · Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes · History · Law · Medical History and Innovations · Medicine · Nursing
| Obras citantes distintas | 4 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 0,29 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2005 - 2016 (12) |
| Velocidade de citação | historical |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 3 |