Everybody Did It'-or Did They
The Use of Oral History in Researching Women's Experiences of Smoking in Britain, 1930-1970
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 4348074 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Rosemary Elliot (0000-0003-1808-8234, University of the Arts London, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2006 |
| Volume | 15 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 297-322 |
| Publication date | 2006-04-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Women s History Review (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0961-2025 • E-ISSN: 1747-583X |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/09612020500529770 |
| OpenAlex | W2030015640 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
From having been predominantly a masculine habit in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, cigarette smoking was adopted by flappers and film stars in the 1920s and 30s, symbolising new types of femininity. However, it was not until the economic and social dislocation of the Second World War that substantial numbers of women began to smoke cigarettes. This article draws on oral history material to explore the reasons why women took up smoking during and following the Second World War. It suggests that smoking among women became more acceptable in a wider range of circumstances following the War, reflecting the adaptability of the cigarette and its role in negotiating an increasingly diverse range of femininities. The article examines the impact of current anti‐smoking discourse on smoking narratives, as interviewees set up opposing discourses of social acceptance in their youth and awareness of the health risks today
Art · Femininity · Habit · Literature · Masculinity · Narrative · Negotiation · Oral history · Political science · Social science · Sociology · World War II · Anthropology · Gender Studies · Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes · History · Participatory Visual Research Methods · Psychology · Social Psychology
| Citations per year | 0.2 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2021 - 2021 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |