Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The Real Problem with Evolutionary Debunking Arguments

Bibliographic Data

ID4351399
AuthorsLouise Hanson (0009-0002-6101-2745, corresponding author)
Year2016
Pagespqw075
Publication date2016-12-02
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe Philosophical Quarterly (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0031-8094 • E-ISSN: 1467-9213
PublisherOxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1093/pq/pqw075
OpenAlexW2558460939
LanguageEN
Citations received7
References cited28

There is a substantial literature on evolutionary debunking arguments (EDAs) in metaethics. According to these arguments, evolutionary explanations of our moral beliefs pose a significant problem for moral realism, specifically by committing the realist to an unattractive pessimism about the prospects of our having moral knowledge. In this paper, I argue that EDAs exploit an equivocation between two distinct readings of their central claim. One is plausibly true but has no epistemic relevance, and the other would have epistemic consequences for realism, but is false. If I'm right, this undermines attempts to use evolutionary explanations to debunk belief in other domains too

EDAS · Epistemology · Equivocation · Moral psychology · Moral realism · Pessimism · Philosophical realism · Political science · Realism · Relevance (law · Artificial Intelligence · Computer Science · Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics · Law · Philosophical Ethics and Theory · Philosophy · Psychology · Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment

  • Moral perception

    Open Access•Preston J Werner•Philosophy Compass•2020

  • Practical Intelligibility and Moral Skepticism

    Open Access•Micah Lott•Pacific philosophical quarterly•2021

  • A dilemma for evolutionary debunking arguments

    Open Access•Uri D Leibowitz•Philosophical Studies•2021

  • The limits of rational belief revision

    Open Access•Katia Vavova•Noûs•2021

  • Evolutionary debunking arguments, moral knowledge and underdetermination

    Carolyn Noonan•Inquiry•2025

  • Evolution, Utilitarianism, and Normative Uncertainty

    Open Access•Andreas L Mogensen, William Macaskill•Journal of Ethics and Social…•2022

  • Evolutionary debunking arguments and the explanatory scope of natural selection

    Open Access•Joeri Witteveen•Synthese•2021

  • Taking Morality Seriously

    Dan Enoch, David Enoch•Taking morality seriously•2011

  • A Darwinian Dilemma for Realist Theories of Value

    Open Access•Sharon Street•Philosophical Studies•2006

  • Ethics and Intuitions

    Open Access•Peter Singer•The Journal of Ethics•2005

  • The epistemological challenge to metanormative realism

    Open Access•Dan Enoch, David Enoch•Philosophical Studies•2010

  • Evolutionary Debunking, Moral Realism and Moral Knowledge

    Open Access•Russ Shafer-Landau, Russ Shafer‐landau•Journal of Ethics and Social…•2013

  • Natural Selection and Distributive Explanation

    Elliott Sober•The British Journal for the…•1995

  • Explaining Complex Adaptations

    Karen Neander•The British Journal for the…•1995

  • Evolution, Wisconsin Style

    Mohan Matthen•The British Journal for the…•1999

  • Darwin and moral realism

    Open Access•Knut Olav Skarsaune•Philosophical Studies•2009

  • Moral Realism

    Russ Shafer-Landau, Russ Shafer‐landau•Moral realism•2003

Unique citing works7
Citations per year1,17
Citation span2020 - 2025 (6)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 6

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae