Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Can We have Justified Beliefs about Fundamental Properties

Bibliographic Data

ID4352046
AuthorsDarren Bradley (0000-0002-4410-8633, Philosophy, University of Leeds , UK, corresponding author)
Year2023
Volume74
Issue1
Pages46-67
Publication date2023-12-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe Philosophical Quarterly (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0031-8094 • E-ISSN: 1467-9213
PublisherOxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1093/pq/pqad012
OpenAlexW4321786470
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited35

An attractive picture of the world is that some features are metaphysically fundamental and others are derivative, with the derivative features grounded in the fundamental features. But how do we have justified beliefs about which features are fundamental? What is the epistemology of fundamentality? I sketch a response in this paper. The guiding idea is that the same properties cause the same experiences. I argue that a probabilistic connection between epistemic fundamentality and metaphysical fundamentality is sufficient for justified beliefs about the metaphysically fundamental

Algorithm · Connection (principal bundle) · Epistemology · Metaphysics · Sketch · Computer Science · Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics · Mathematics · Philosophy · Philosophy and History of Science · Philosophy and Theoretical Science

  • Indistinguishability as a constraint on priors

    Open Access•Ronit Avni•Synthese•2024

  • Making Things Up

    Karen Bennett•Making Things Up•2017

  • Laws and Symmetry

    Bas C Van Fraassen•Laws and Symmetry•1989

  • Meaning and Reference

    Hilary Putnam•The Journal of Philosophy•1973

  • A better best system account of lawhood

    Open Access•Jonathan Cohen, Craig Callender•Philosophical Studies•2009

  • Naming and Necessity

    Saul A Kripke•Semantics of Natural Language•1972

  • No Work for a Theory of Grounding

    Jessica Wilson, Jessica M Wilson•Inquiry•2014

  • Symposium: Chance and Credence

    David Lewis•Mind•1994

  • New work for a theory of universals

    David Lewis•Australasian Journal of Philosophy•1983

  • Metametaphysics

    David Chalmers, David Manley et al.•Metametaphysics•2009

  • The Fragmentation of Being

    Kris Mcdaniel•The Fragmentation of Being•2017

  • Natural Kinds

    W V Quine•Ontological Relativity and Other…•1969

  • Ambitious, Yet Modest, Metaphysics

    Thomas Hofweber•Metametaphysics•2009

  • Writing the Book of the World

    Theodore Sider•Writing the book of the world•2011

  • Could a middle level be the most fundamental

    Open Access•Sara Bernstein•Philosophical Studies•2021

  • Not Enough There There Evidence, Reasons, and Language Independence

    Open Access•Michael G Titelbaum•Philosophical Perspectives•2010

  • Bare Particulars”

    Open Access•Theodore Sider•Philosophical Perspectives•2006

  • Epistemic Permissiveness

    Open Access•Roger White•Philosophical Perspectives•2005

  • Representing and Explaining

    Open Access•Alisa Bokulich•Philosophy of Science•2018

  • Is Structural Realism Possible

    Open Access•Stathis Psillo, Stathis Psillos•Philosophy of Science•2001

  • Monism

    Jonathan Schaffer•The Philosophical Review•2010

  • Realism and the Absence of Value

    Shamik Dasgupta•The Philosophical Review•2018

Citations per year0.5
Citation span2024 - 2024 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae