Chronemic urgency in everyday digital communication
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 4356070 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Yoram M Kalman (0000-0002-7349-254X, The Open University of Israel, Raanana, Israel, corresponding author), Dawna I Ballard (0000-0001-8648-068X, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA), Ana M Aguilar (The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA) |
| Year | 2021 |
| Volume | 30 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 153-175 |
| Publication date | 2021-05-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Time & Society (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0961-463X • E-ISSN: 1461-7463 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1177/0961463x20987721 |
| OpenAlex | W3128997904 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 5 |
| References cited | 41 |
The experience of a lack of time due to an increasing burden of urgent tasks is one of the more common challenges created by digital communication media in the network society. This study develops the concept of chronemic urgency to explore urgent messaging using digital media. Chronemic urgency is the urgency users assign to messages received via a specific communication medium. Consistent with a communication perspective, the urgency is a function of both the relationship and the media. This study uses social entrainment theory and expectancy violations theory to conceptualize the chronemic urgency construct. This construct is then examined in a pilot study of the chronemic urgency 773 US-based participants assign to the communication media they use at least on a weekly basis. High chronemic urgency is assigned to messages received through media that (1) are used for urgent communication, (2) are checked more often, (3) are likely to be used by others who wish to contact the user urgently, and (4) are likely to lead to a quicker response. Despite the increasing centrality of urgency in everyday communication in the digital age, researchers and practitioners lack reliable methods to measure chronemic urgency in populations. The findings provide initial indications of levels of chronemic urgency in the US population's everyday digital communication and create a foundation to better understand contemporary temporal phenomena
Centrality · Construct (python library · Digital media · Epistemology · Everyday life · Function (biology · Internet privacy · Perspective (graphical · Social media · World Wide Web · Complex Network Analysis Techniques · Computer Science · Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence · Psychology · Social Psychology · Team Dynamics and Performance
Organizational communication for social change on social media
Always On, Always Rushed For Time? Exploring Momentary Associations Between Passively Sensed Smartphone Use, Feeling Rushed, and Perceived Task Juggling
Community health workers and the communicative transformation of work-life interrelationships during the Covid-19 pandemic
Urgency at work
No response? Chronemic expectancy violation and relational turbulence in technologically-mediated romantic relational conflict
Time and human interaction
Reputation as a sufficient condition for data quality on Amazon Mechanical Turk
Need fulfillment and experiences on social media
Sociomaterial Practices
Interpersonal Effects in Computer-Mediated Interaction
Nonverbal cues in computer‐mediated communication, and the effect of chronemics on relational communication
“Technoference” and implications for mothers' and fathers' couple and coparenting relationship quality
Communicating on Twitter during a disaster
Unique in the Crowd
Reclaiming, proclaiming, and maintaining collective identity in the #YoSoy132 movement in Mexico
Nomophobia
Social Acceleration
Comparing Rating Scales of Different Lengths
Crowdsourcing research
Nonverbal expectancy violations
Type A behaviour and time urgency
Online chronemics convey social information
How journalists engage in branding on Twitter
Effects of time limits and task types on task performance and interaction of four-person groups
Making Time
Nonverbal Expectancies and the Evaluative Consequences of Violations
| Citations per year | 1.67 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2023 - 2025 (3) |
| Highly cited | No |