From the families we choose to the families we find online
Media Technology and Queer Family Making
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 4367161 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Rikke Andreassen (0000-0003-0692-6288, Roskilde University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2023 |
| Volume | 24 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 12-29 |
| Publication date | 2023-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Feminist Theory (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1464-7001 • E-ISSN: 1741-2773 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1177/14647001211059517 |
| OpenAlex | W4205555866 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 9 |
| References cited | 35 |
Since the mid-2000s, a number of Western countries have witnessed an increase in the number of children born into 'alternative' or 'queer' families. Parallel with this queer baby boom, online media technologies have become intertwined with most people's intimate lives. While these two phenomena have appeared simultaneously, their integration has seldom been explored. In an attempt to fill this gap, the present article explores the ways in which contemporary queer reproduction is interwoven with online media practices. Importantly, the article does not understand online media as a technology that simply facilitates queer kinship; rather, it argues that online media technology is a reproductive technology in its own right. Drawing on empirical examples of media practices of kinning, such as online shopping for donor sperm and locating 'donor siblings' via online fora such as Facebook, the article analyses the merging and intersection of online media and queer kinship. These analyses serve as a foundation for an exploration of contemporary kinship and the development of a new theoretical framework for contemporary queer reproduction. Empirically, the examples are from single women's (i.e. solo mothers) and lesbian couples' family making. Using Weston's work on 'chosen families' as a backdrop for discussion, the article describes families of choice in light of new online kinship connections. In particular, the article focuses on online-initiated connections between donor siblings and how such connections can re-inscribe biology as important to queer kinship. Furthermore, it closely examines how media technology guides queer reproduction in particular directions and how technology causes becoming as a family
Biology · Kinship · Lesbian · Media studies · Queer · Queer theory · Reproduction · Sociology · Anthropology · Gender Studies · LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy · Reproductive Health and Technologies · Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
The Relationship Between Social Media Use and Social Capital Among MSM University Students in Wuhan, China
(Un)recognisable Parents‐to‐Be
“Thank you for the Nurture”
The Internet as a social institution
Matching, friending, and swiping for sperm donors
Reconfiguring the Family
We don't tolerate each other; we actually respect and love each other”
Sprouting sideways
The digitalization of family life
The Culture of Connectivity
Life after New Media
Quantum Entanglements and Hauntological Relations of Inheritance
The Oxford Handbook of Internet Studies
Mediated Intimacies
Migration and New Media
Researching Women's Lives From A Feminist Perspective
Fabrication as Ethical Practice
Vulnerability and Acceptance
A Crucial but Strenuous Process
Becoming fertile in the land of organic milk
Gender Trouble
Biomedicalization
The role of gender, environment and Individual biography in shaping qualitative interview data
Race, Nation, and the Production of Intimacy
Efforts to maintain a ‘just great’ story
Child adjustment and parenting in planned lesbian-parent families
Biotourist Performances
Mediated Kinship
Biological Relatives
The Practice of Qualitative Research
Representations of reproductive citizenship and vulnerability in media reports of offshore surrogacy
New kinships, new family formations and negotiations of intimacy via social media sites
Social Imaginaries, Sperm and Whiteness
Sharing Motherhood
Simians, Cyborgs, and Women
American Kinship
Donor-Shared Siblings or Genetic Strangers
| Unique citing works | 9 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 3 |
| Citation span | 2023 - 2026 (4) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 8 |