Troubling power and knowledge creation dynamics through research subject inter-viewing
Critically Exploring the Field of Possibilities
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 4367273 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Megan Rådesjö (0000-0001-6408-2090, University of Gothenburg, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 26 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 247-265 |
| Publication date | 2025-04-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Feminist Theory (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1464-7001 • E-ISSN: 1741-2773 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1177/14647001241305346 |
| OpenAlex | W4406128059 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 43 |
Interviewing is a commonly used qualitative method in social scientific research. However, researchers departing from feminist theories have long been critical of power and knowledge creation dynamics in the context of this method. In contribution to this literature, this article aims to introduce research subject inter-viewing, which is an interview guide-facilitated audio- or video-recorded interview between at least two research subjects. The researcher is the organiser and coordinator but is not present during the interview. Instead, the research subjects interview each other about the problem or phenomenon that the researcher delineates through interview topics, questions or vignettes. In this article, I critically explore research subject inter-viewing's field of possibilities through seven research subject interviews with fourteen participants. In this critical exploration, research subject inter-viewing changed the power and knowledge creation dynamics during the interview process. It shifted to a dynamic between research subjects changing the scope of knowledge creation through the research subjects' initiatives. Therefore, research subject inter-viewing contributes an alternative approach to interviewing that facilitates a transformative shift of power dynamics and opens new ways of co-creating sensitive or cultural knowledge in an interview setting
Epistemology · Pedagogy · Sociology · Computer Science · Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods · Participatory Visual Research Methods · Philosophy · Psychology · Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
Ethics in Qualitative Research
Research Methods in Education
Colonialism/Postcolonialism
Interviewing as a Data Collection Method
Human Nature and the Social Order
Feminist Insider Dilemmas
Reciprocal Peer Interviewing
Interviewing in Social Science Research
Women of the Klan
Handbook of Feminist Research
InterViews
Feminist Studies
Interviews – Learning the Craft of Qualitative Research Interviewing
Posthumanist Performativity
Using peer‐interviewing methods to explore place‐based disadvantage
The self-interview
I’m being heard right now’
Power in elite interviewing
Methodological and ethical issues in feminist research with abused women
Fokusgruppsintervjuer i teori och praktik
Positionality, Power, and Positions of Power
Can there be a feminist ethnography
Introducing Dyadic Interviews as a Method for Collecting Qualitative Data
Using Joint Interviews to Add Analytic Value
When the Methodological Shoe is on the Other Foot
Talking Back
Feminist Online Interviewing
Under Western Eyes
Situated Knowledges
The Interpretive Interview. An Interview Form Centring on Research Participants' Constructions
When Women Study Men
The Couple Interview as a Method of Collecting Data in Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis Studies
Objections in Research Interviewing
Dyadic interviewing
Dominance Through Interviews and Dialogues
Creating Knowledge Collaboratively with Female Sex Workers
When Gender is not Enough
Postbook
When the Girls Are Men
Age and Sex in the Interview
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 2 |
| Citation span | 2025 - 2026 (2) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 1 |