Resisting the binary
Reconciling Victimhood and Agency in Discourses of Sexual Violence
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 4367451 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Pallavi Raghavan (0000-0003-2040-5278, Institute of Development Studies, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 25 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 417-435 |
| Publication date | 2024-08-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Feminist Theory (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1464-7001 • E-ISSN: 1741-2773 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1177/14647001231201059 |
| OpenAlex | W4387307113 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 4 |
| References cited | 44 |
Queer, post-colonial and Black feminist scholars and activists have long cautioned against the dangerous exclusions and complicities entailed in even the best-intentioned efforts to counter sexual violence. The rhetoric of protecting women from sexual violence is frequently and effectively invoked in order to rehabilitate old colonial projects and justify new ones that persecute sexual dissidents, police gender, sexual and caste transgressions and re-inscribe neoliberal and neo-conservative rationalities across the globe. This article argues that many of the exclusionary, violent and coercive consequences of efforts to protect women from sexual violence are rooted in mischaracterisations or mis-descriptions of the subject of sexual violence, and enabled by particular (mis)orientations towards this subject. Specifically, I suggest that the imagination and representation of the subject of sexual violence is subtended by a politically dangerous and conceptually untenable victim/agent binary. Mediated by rationalities of caste, race, class and religion, women are imagined either as vulnerable victims in need of protection, or as capable (even culpable) agents, but never simultaneously both. The failure to reconcile victimhood and agency within discourses of sexual violence is precisely the condition of possibility for a range of violent, exclusionary and regulatory outcomes. This article tracks the effects of the victim/agent binary in dominant responses to sexual violence, before assembling the foundations from which to rethink victimhood and agency away from their binary orthodoxy, drawing centrally on the radical subjectivity of pain
Criminology · Heterosexuality · Homosexuality · Human sexuality · Queer · Sexual revolution · Sexual violence · Social science · Sociology · Subjectivity · Gender Politics and Representation · Gender Studies · Gender, Security, and Conflict · Sex work and related issues
Gender, Alterity and Human Rights
Me, not you
Real and Imagined Women
Essence of Culture and a Sense of History
Knowing Victims
In Other Worlds
Rethinking Agency
Race, racism and development
Disciplining Foucault
Vulnerability in Resistance
Feminists Theorize the Political
In the Name of Womens Rights
Jurisdictions
Enacting/Disrupting the Will to Empower
Sexual Violence as the Language of Border Control
Toward a New Feminist Theory of Rape
Gender Trouble
The politics of the body
On the Question of Agency in Indian Feminist Historiography
Under Western Eyes
Reconstructing Gender
Race’, Gender and Neoliberalism
Race and Essentialism in Feminist Legal Theory
Mapping the Margins
Sociology and Beyond
Brief History of Neoliberalism
Foucault and Critique
The Empire Prays Back
Suspending Damage
Brexit, Trump, and 'methodological whiteness
Vulnerability after Wounding
Feminism and War
Securing the nation through the politics of sexual violence
The Virtual Speculum in the New World Order
Dead Women Tell No Tales
Do Muslim Women Really Need Saving? Anthropological Reflections on Cultural Relativism and Its Others
The Humanitarian Politics of Testimony
Vulnerability and Victimization
Gender and nation
| Unique citing works | 4 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 4 |
| Citation span | 2025 - 2026 (2) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 3 |