Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The Fallacy of "Fallacy" and Its Implications for Contemporary Literary Theory

Bibliographic Data

ID4370449
AuthorsCharles Altieri (corresponding author)
Year2017
Volume140
Issue1
Pages175-193
Publication date2017-11-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueRepresentations (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0734-6018 • E-ISSN: 1533-855X
PublisherUniversity of California Press (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1525/rep.2017.140.1.175
OpenAlexW2770909581
LanguageEN

The Fallacy of 'Fallacy'" concentrates on the limitations of logical binaries in constructing arguments for literary theory. My test case is claims about intention. Theorists argue either that intentions can and must be determined or that intention is a psychological entity that cannot be determined simply from textual evidence, even when buttressed by biographical contexts. But such debates center on intentions to mean. This essay argues that literary texts are makings and not statements, so they display a relation to the world rather than assert it. It follows that when dealing with makings we usually have to look not for a specific psychological intention to mean but a way of clarifying how the display works. Therefore it may be best to equate intention with the taking of responsibility that the author assumes when deciding to publish or present materials. What is a plausible account of a series of decisions that led the author to want to make something public

Epistemology · Fallacy · Political science · Publication · Sociology · Computer Science · Law · Narrative Theory and Analysis · Philosophy · Psychology · Social Psychology

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae